Few things in nature are more dramatic than lightning. Or more dangerous. But if “safety first” is a criterion for intelligence, photographers are stupid. Because lightning is both dangerous and unpredictable, the more you understand lightning, how to anticipate it and stay safe in its presence, the greater your odds of surviving to take more pictures. (But you’ll never be safer than you will be simply staying inside.)
A lightning bolt is an atmospheric manifestation of the truism that opposites attract. In nature, we get a spark when two oppositely charged objects come in close proximity. For example, when you get shocked touching a doorknob, on a very small scale, you’ve been struck by lightning.
In a thunderstorm, the up/down flow of atmospheric convection creates turbulence that knocks together airborne water (both raindrops and ice) molecules, stripping their (negatively charged) electrons. Lighter, positively charged molecules are carried upward in the convection’s updrafts, while the heavier negatively charged molecules remain near the bottom of the cloud. Soon the cloud is electrically polarized, with more positively charged molecules at the top than at the base.
Nature really, really wants to correct this imbalance, and always takes the easiest path—if the easiest path to electrical equilibrium is between the cloud top and cloud bottom, we get intracloud lightning; if it’s between two different clouds, we get intercloud lightning. And the less frequent cloud-to-ground strikes occur when the easiest path to equilibrium is between the cloud and ground.
With lightning comes thunder, the sound of air expanding explosively when heated by a 50,000-degree jolt of electricity. Thunder travels at the speed of sound, a pedestrian 750 miles per hour, while lightning’s flash zips along at the speed of light, more than 186,000 miles per second—nearly a million times faster than sound.
Knowing that the thunder occurred at the same instant as the lightning flash, and the speed both travel, we can calculate the approximate distance of the lightning strike. While we see the lightning pretty much instantaneously, regardless of its distance, thunder takes about five seconds to cover a mile. So dividing by 5 the number of seconds between the instant of the lightning’s flash and the arrival of the thunder’s crash gives you the lightning’s approximate distance in miles (divide by three for kilometers).
The 2000 (or so) people killed by lightning each year had one thing in common with you and me: they didn’t believe they’d be struck by lightning when they started whatever it was they were doing when they died. So before thinking you’d like to photograph lightning, you must understand that the only sure way to be safe in an electrical storm is to be in a fully enclosed structure with plumbing and/or grounded wiring, away from windows, plumbing, wiring, and electronics. The next best option is probably a hard-top vehicle with the windows closed (myth buster: a car’s lightning safety has nothing to do with its tires).
Unfortunately, photographing lightning usually requires being outside. And though there’s no completely safe way to photograph lightning, it doesn’t hurt to improve your odds of surviving enough to enjoy the fruits of your labor.
Most lightning strikes within a ten-mile radius of the previous strike. So, if less than thirty seconds elapses between the flash and bang, you’re too close. And since “most” doesn’t mean “all,” it’s best to allow a little margin for error. It also helps to know that thunder isn’t usually audible beyond ten miles, so if you hear thunder, assume that you could be in the sights of the next lightning strike.
But if you absolutely, positively must be outside with the lightning firing about you, or you simply find yourself caught outside with no available shelter, here’s some knowledge that will improve your chances:
If, after factoring in all the risks, you still like the idea of photographing lightning, you need to gear up. The extreme contrast between darkness and brilliant lightning means photographing lightning at night is mostly a matter of pointing your camera in the right direction with a multi-second shutter speed and hoping the lightning fires while your shutter’s open—pretty straightforward.
Photographing daylight lightning is more problematic. It’s usually over before you can react, so any success just watching and clicking is probably dumb luck. And using a neutral density filter to stretch the exposure time out to multiple seconds sounds great in theory, but in daylight, a lightning bolt with a life measured in milliseconds, captured in an exposure measured in seconds, will almost certainly lack the contrast necessary to show up in an image.
Most lightning sensors (all?) attach to your camera’s hot shoe and connect via a special cable to the camera’s remote-release port. When engaged, the sensor fires the shutter immediately upon detecting lightning, whether or not the lightning is visible to the eye or camera. With so many lightning sensors from which to choose, I did lots of research before buying my first one. I ended up choosing the sensor that was the consensus choice among photographers I know and trust: Lightning Trigger from Stepping Stone Products in Dolores, CO. At around $350 (including the cable), the Lightning Trigger is not the cheapest option, but after many years leading lightning-oriented photo workshops, I can say with lots of confidence that lightning sensors are not generic products, and the internal technology matters a lot. Based on my own results and observations, the Lightning Trigger is the only one I’d use and recommend (I get no kickback for this). On the other hand, if you already have a lightning sensor you’re happy with, there’s no reason to switch.
I won’t get into lots of specifics about how to set up the Lightning Trigger because it’s simple and covered fairly well in the included documentation. But you should know that of the things that sets the Lightning Trigger apart from many others is its ability to put your camera in the “shutter half pressed” mode, which greatly reduces shutter lag (see below). But that also means that connecting the LT will probably disable your LCD replay, so you won’t be able to review your captures without turning it off. You also might not be able to adjust your exposure and perform other camera control tasks with the Lightning Trigger connected—the amount of limitation varies with the camera.
The Lightning Trigger documentation promises a range of at least a 20 mile, and after using mine at the Grand Canyon for years, I’ve seen nothing that causes me to question that—if anything, without actually testing it, I’d guess that its range is at least 30 miles. The LT documentation also says you can expect the sensor to fire at lightning that’s not necessarily in front of you, or lightning you can’t see at all, which I will definitely confirm. For every click with lightning in my camera’s field of view, I get many clicks caused by lightning I didn’t see, or that were outside my camera’s field of view. But when visible lightning does fire anywhere in the general direction of my composition (a lightning sensor has no idea how your composition is framed), I estimate that my Lightning Trigger clicked the shutter at least 95 percent of the time (that is, even though I got lots of false positives, the Lightning Trigger missed very few bolts it should have detected). Of these successful clicks, I actually captured lightning in at least 2/3 of the frames.
The misses are a function of the timing between lightning and camera—sometimes the lightning is just too fast for the camera’s shutter lag, something I’ve observed can be at least partially storm specific—some storms seem to have shorter duration lightning strikes than others. In general, the more violent the storm, the greater the likelihood of bolts of longer duration, and multiple strokes that are easier to capture. And my success rate has noticeably increased since switching from a Canon 5DIII to the much faster Sony Alpha bodies.
The camera matters
Lightning is fast—really, really fast—so the faster your camera’s shutter responds after getting the command to fire, the more success you’ll have. The delay between the click instruction (whether from your finger on the shutter button, a remote release, or a lightning sensor) and the shutter firing is the “shutter lag.”
In general, interchangeable lens cameras (mirrorless and DSLR) have the fastest shutter lag. But even with an ILC, it’s surprising how much shutter lag varies from manufacturer to manufacturer, and even between models from the same manufacturer.
Ideally, your camera’s shutter lag should be no slower than 60 milliseconds (.06 seconds), but 120 milliseconds (.12 seconds) is generally fast enough. Most of the top cameras from Sony, Nikon, and Canon are fast enough—currently, Sonys are fastest, Nikon is a close second, and Canon is third.
And shutter lag can vary with the manufacturer’s model: While my Sony a7RIV may be the fastest camera out there, my original a7R was unusably slow, so you need to check your model’s shutter lag.
Unfortunately, shutter lag isn’t usually in the manufacturers’ specifications. The best source I’ve found is the “Pre-focused” time in the Performance tab of the camera reviews at Imaging Resource.
In addition to a lightning sensor and fast camera, you’ll need:
I’ve used a few lightning apps, but I finally think I’ve found one worthy of recommending: My Lightning Tracker. I find it easy to use, and reliable. I have the “pro” version, which just means I paid a few dollars so I don’t have to see ads.
My Lightning Tracker has too many useful features to list here, but the most important thing it does is give me a good idea where the lightning is firing now (as long as I have a cellular or wifi connection), and how far away it is. It will also alert me of any strikes within a user-specified radius.
If I wait until I the app tells me there’s lightning nearby before heading in that direction, I’m often too late. So I also appreciate My Lightning Tracker’s option to view the local weather radar, which helps me identify potential active storms before the lightning starts.
Getting the shot
Even if you can photograph lightning from your front porch, it’s usually best to pick a nice scene, then monitor the weather so you can be there to capture lightning with a great foreground. I strongly recommend that you scout these lightning scenes in advance, not just for possible compositions, but for safe places to set up, escape routes, and a place to retreat to if the lightning gets too close. I try never to shoot more than a quick sprint from my car.
Once you’re there, don’t wait until you see lightning before setting up your gear. If the sky looks even a little promising, get everything ready: tripod out, camera and lens mounted, lightning sensor attached. Then test your lightning sensor to make sure it fires your camera—I can’t tell you how easy it is to overlook one little thing and wonder why the lightning is firing but your camera isn’t. I test my Lightning Triggers with a TV remote, or with the flash from my iPhone camera.
The trickiest part of lightning photography is getting the exposure right while using best shutter speed. Too fast and you risk missing all of the strokes; too long and you risk washing out the lightning. The ideal lightning shutter speed range is 1/4 to 1/20 second—shutter speeds faster than 1/20 second risk completing the exposure before the secondary strokes fire; slower shutter speeds tend to wash out the lightning.
My personal sweet-spot is around 1/8 second, but I’ll shoot for the faster end of my ideal shutter speed range when there’s lots of sunlight, and stretch the exposure out toward 1/4 second when dark clouds rule the entire scene. And I’ll go even longer than 1/4 second when twilight darkens the scene further.
To achieve daylight shutter speeds between 1/4 and 1/20 second, I often need to use a polarizer and set my ISO to 50, with an aperture of f/16 or smaller. Of course exposure values will vary with the amount of light available, and you may not need such extreme settings when shooting into an extremely dark sky. The two stops of light cut by a polarizer helps a lot, but 4- or 6-stop neutral density filter is even better with dealing with fairly bright skies.
When the sky is relatively bright, dropping to 1/20 second can help the lightning stand out better than 1/8 second, but risks losing secondary strikes. Conversely, when the sky is extremely dark and the lightning is firing like crazy, extending to 1/4 second might increase your chances for capturing multiple pulses.
Lightning is most likely to strike in or near the gray curtains that hang beneath dark clouds (clearly recognizable as distant rain)—not only near the center, but often on the fringe or just outside. And the darkest and tallest clouds are usually the most likely to fire lightning. If you’re in the storm that you’re photographing, you’re too close.
The best lens for lightning is usually a midrange zoom, such as a 24-70 or 24-105. If you find yourself reaching for your 16-35 (or wider), you’re too close.
I generally start fairly wide to increase my margin for error (to avoid missing a bolt just outside my frame), but once I’m sure I’ve captured some good strikes, I often tighten my composition. While this narrower field of view can reduce the number of frames with lightning, the ones I get are much larger in the frame.
Here are a few more composition points to consider:
There’s a lot of standing around while photographing lightning, but storms move, so the more you can keep your eyes on the sky (instead of your phone), the better you’ll be at keeping lightning in your frame as the storm moves, and knowing when the activity is picking up or winding down. The light can change by several stops as the storm moves, intensifies, or winds down, so check your exposure frequently. And monitor your surroundings for active cells moving up behind you.
Be aware that electrical storms can move quite quickly, and more than one cell can be active in a given area, so monitor the sky closely—not just the storm you’re photographing, but scan for potential cells that could be sneaking up on you. Sometimes this simply means adjusting your composition to account for shifting lightning; other times it means retreating to the car if the cell threatens your location. No shot is worth your life.
One final note: If you check my exposure settings, you’ll see that my shutter speed here was .4 seconds, well outside the 1/20-1/4 second range I suggest. But if you look at the other settings, you’ll see that I’d opened up to f/7.1, and had cranked my ISO to 400, an indication that twilight was settling in. Successful lightning photograph is all about contrast, and the darker the sky, the better the bolt stands out, even in a longer exposure. Had we stayed past dark (and lived), we could have jettisoned the Lighting Triggers and used multi-second exposures.
Here’s an article by one of my workshop students describing a great processing technique for enhancing your lightning.
Join and me in my next Grand Canyon Monsoon Photo Workshop
Read my article in Outdoor Photographer magazine, Shooting the Monsoon
Click an image for a closer look and slide show. Refresh the window to reorder the display.
Pingback: The Grand Canyon, lightning, and lots (!) of people « Eloquent Nature by Gary Hart
Here in Florida, we have an occassional thunderstorm…I use a Delkin Mini Mount suction cup unit and mount my camera to the side window of my truck. That way I can sit in the relative safety of my vehicle while attempting the capture.
Yeah, I imagine, living in Florida, you’re probably a thunderstorm expert. Unfortunately, the Grand Canyon doesn’t lend itself to photographing from the car. Our original plan was to set up the cameras with the lightning triggers and wait in the car, but with all the people we couldn’t find a suitable location.
Keep me in touch of your next trip to the Grand Caynon. Sounds like fun.
Will do, Scott. Right now Don and I are just doing a personal photo trip, but we’ve talked about creating a workshop around the Grand Canyon monsoon. If we do that, the first year may be alumni only (you’d qualify there), with invitations ordered by the number of past workshops attended until it fills. But there are liability concerns to be addressed, plus the question of whether we have the time and energy to organize another workshop.
Just bought a motion/lightning trigger and I’m trying to test the lightning mode by firing a strobe at it from across the room. Nothing happens. Should it? Motion mode works fine. Not sure if I have a IR remote laying around somewhere. It’s still Winter here in Wisconsin so no lightning for awhile. I’ve got 28 days to send it back. Any advice would be greatly appreciated. Never used one of these before. Thank you.
Did you purchase a Lightning Trigger from Stepping Stone? That’s the only one I have experience with and recommend. If that’s what you have, pretty much any standard TV/VCR/DVD/audio remote should work. I suggest contacting Rich at Stepping Stone, http://www.ligtningtrigger.com. If you don’t have a Lightning Trigger, I don’t know what to say——the few people in my workshops who have had something different have had problems, which is why I only recommend the Lightning Trigger.
Thanks so much for the reply. I will contact Rich.
Maybe you can help answer some questions given all the lightning workshops you run. Stepping Stone (http://www.ligtningtrigger.com) sells two models of Lightning Trigger, the LT3 and the LT-IV, but I’ve not been able to find any credible data/reviews outside of that site comparing the two. So:
1) Which model do you personally use?
2) Do you think it’s worth upgrading to an LT-IV if you already own an LT3?
Thanks for any insight.
I use the LT-IV, but have also owned an LT3. My recommendation is to get the LT-IV if you don’t already have the LT3, but the difference isn’t great enough to justify replacing it.
Excellent article with a good balance of safety and technique.
A great article by a real master. Thanks !
Thank you, Stephen!
Gary, do you still recommend the Lightning Trigger, as I know your original post was several years ago. There’s now a lot of other products out there, but getting good reviews are rather difficult. Let me know your current thinking on this, as I’d like to incorporate lightning images into my landscapes. Thanks old neighbor.
Yes, definitely recommend the Lightning Trigger. It’s not the cheapest, and there may be others that work as well or better, but I haven’t seen them. You’ll get a lot of clicks for lightning you don’t see, but it rarely misses the visible strikes with 30 miles. With a Lightning Trigger, the limiting factor will be your camera’s shutter lag.
I’ve been fascinated by storms since I was a kid (a very long time ago 😆) and would love to take your workshop some day. However, I’m not sure I want to invest that much money on a lightning trigger until I know I’m going to be using it regularly. Do you know of any that are reasonably accurate without a $300+ investment? That way I could practice and see if it’s something I want photograph often. Thank for all you great blogs and wonderful images.
Thanks, Elizabeth. Honestly, I’ve never found a lightning sensor that works as well as the Lightning Trigger. I can’t say one doesn’t exist, but I can say that the people who have shown up to my workshops with something different have been extremely frustrated—some to the point of order a Lightning Trigger during the workshop, or purchasing a used extra one from someone else in the group. (I get no kickback or other benefit from recommending it—I just want my workshop students to have the best experience.)
Great blog you haave here
You have SO many great lightning strike photos! You have me hooked on trying to “catch” them as well!