Starlight

Gary Hart Photography: Starfire, Halemaumau Crater, Kilauea, Hawaii

Starfire, Halemaumau Crater, Kilauea, Hawaii

With pretty much any DSLR, a sturdy tripod, fast lens, and just little knowledge, you can now capture landscapes beneath more stars than you ever imagined possible. A camera’s ability to accumulate light allows it to reveal stars far fainter than the naked eye sees; rapidly advancing digital SLR technology now enables usable (low noise) images at the extreme ISOs necessary for star-freezing shutter speeds in very low light.

Prerequisites

I’m starting with the assumption that you have a relatively new digital SLR, one that allows you to capture fairly clean (low noise) images at 1600 ISO or higher. You’ll need to be fairly comfortable with managing the controls in the dark, and know how to get it into manual and bulb modes. For star trails a locking remote release is essential (one that allows you to lock down the shutter rather than forcing you to hold it down for the duration of the exposure).

And of course don’t even think about trying any of this without a rock-solid tripod (you don’t need to spend tons of money, but neither can you assume any tripod will work—it won’t!). A wide (35 mm or wider on full frame is best), fast (at least f4, but the faster the better) lens is best. Oh yeah, and take off your polarizer.

Test frame

Moonlight photography is great for photographing landscapes beneath a few bright stars, but a sky filled with stars (and maybe even the Milky Way) can only happen when there’s no moon and city light to wash out the faint stars. When I go out on a moonless night, whether my goal is pinpoint stars, star trails, or both, I start with a test frame to determine the amount of light my planned image requires. The test frame also allows me to check my exposure, focus, level, and composition in light that’s nearly opaque to my eyes.

My initial test frame is usually no more than a 30 second, high ISO (the goal isn’t a usable image, it’s solely to determine exposure, focus, and composition) and my lens’s widest aperture. After each click I check my LCD, adjust, and reshoot. The first frame is mostly to gauge the light; subsequent frames refine both the exposure and composition. I’m usually ready to go after two or three test frames.

Once I have an exposure that works (the ideal combination of stars and foreground light), I just need to decide which shutter speed will give me the star effect I want—short for pinpoint stars, long for star trails. With that, finding the ISO and/or f-stop that adds or subtracts the light subtracted or added by my chosen shutter speed is just simple math.

For example, let’s say my test exposure was perfect at ISO 12,800, f2.8, and 15 seconds. A thirty-two minute star trail image will gather a lot more light (than my 15 second test exposure), so I start by figuring out how many stops 30 minutes adds to 15 seconds. Since I have to double ¼ minute (15 seconds) seven times to get to 32 minutes, I know going from 15 seconds to 32 minutes adds 7 stops of light. (2×1/4=1/2 minute -> 2×1/2=1  -> 2×1=2 -> 2×2=4 -> 2×4=8 -> 2×8=16 -> 2×16=32.) On the other hand, if it’s pinpoint stars I’m going for, depending on the speed of my lens, my camera’s high ISO capabilities, and the amount of sky-light on my subject, my test frame

Finding focus

On a moonless night there’s not enough light to see the controls on your camera, the contents of your bag, and the tripod leg you’re about to kick. Needless to say, there’s not enough light to focus either, at least in the traditional ways.

Because we’re usually wide, and very rarely including close detail, our night subjects are almost always at infinity. Unfortunately, that old prime lens habit of twisting the focus ring to the end for infinity focus doesn’t work on a zoom lens—every time you change your focal length, you need to refocus. While I’ve simplified my night photography by going almost exclusively with a 28 mm f2 prime lens, in those rare times I do use a zoom, I usually use it at its widest focal length. Not only does a wide lens maximize the amount of sky in my frame, the extra depth of field increases my range of focus tolerance. And sticking with a single focal length reduces the times I need to hassle with focus.

Despite the hardships, there are a number of methods for focusing at infinity in the dark. Here they are in my order of preference:

  1. 1.    Autofocus on a bright planet or star. Some camera/lens combinations have excellent autofocus (the faster the lens, the better). I always start by picking out the brightest planet/star. Venus is great, but it won’t be up during the darkest hours of the night. Jupiter, Saturn, and Mars can work, as can Sirius and maybe a few other stars. Regardless, you don’t need to know what you’re pointing at—find something bright in the sky, center it in your viewfinder, and try to focus. (Any bright, distant object will do—headlights, a plane overhead, whatever.) Don’t forget to take your lens out of autofocus as soon as it’s focused.
  2. 2.    Live-view focus on a bright planet or star. With my camera on my tripod I center the brightest object in the sky in my viewfinder and lock it in place. I go into live-view mode, center the star/planet in the LV magnification square, then magnify the view to the maximum (it’s 10x on my Canon), and manually focus. Don’t forget to take your lens out of autofocus as soon as it’s focused.
  3. 3.    Autofocus on a nearby flashlight. When all else fails, I have somebody stand 50 feet or so away with a flashlight and autofocus on that. If I’m by myself, I rest the flashlight on a rock (or whatever) and walk (stumble?, grope?) 50 feet away. Believe it or not, if I focus my 28 mm f2 lens (for example), on a point 50 feet away, I’ll be sharp from about 25 feet to infinity, so you should be fine too unless your lens is significantly longer (which I don’t recommend for night photography) or faster (lucky you).  Don’t forget to take your lens out of autofocus as soon as it’s focused.

Don’t forget!: Because there’s no fixed infinity on a zoom lens, if you change your focal length, you must refocus.

Composition

Star Trails and Reflection, Half Dome, Yosemite: I composed this with more foreground (less sky) than I usually do because Half Dome is such a strong visual object, and the reflection was a primary feature of the scene.

Because I love stars, and it’s the stars that really set a night image apart, most of my night images are at least 80% sky. The foreground is more of a placeholder, an excuse to dazzle you with the celestial ceiling. But that does not mean the foreground doesn’t matter. Quite the contrary, because the sky is a relative constant, the foreground is the difference between another pretty picture and something that pulls people from across the room.

It’s not necessary, but when possible I always try to include something recognizable, such as the Big Dipper, Orion, or the Milky Way. This is especially nice in pinpoint star images. If you don’t know the night sky, spend a little familiarizing yourself with the major constellations—you can find many, many smartphone apps to help with this.

Most people’s vision subconsciously runs along the long edge of an image. Since the primary feature or a night image is the sky, at least 2/3 of my night images are oriented vertically. Probably more than 2/3 are vertical when  my foreground is simply an anchor for the sky, and slightly less when the foreground has enough power to compete with the sky. Regardless of my orientation bias for a particular night shoot, I always make sure I have at least one vertical and horizontally oriented image.

I’m constantly on the lookout for a striking foreground to feature beneath a starry sky. Bold objects without a lot of intricate detail work well. Reflective subjects, like water, granite, and sand, work well too. When all else fails, find a rock or tree to silhouette against the sky.

In Yosemite I like Half Dome for the way it stands out against the sky. The Grand Canyon is one of the few locations a magnificent expanse that can match a dark night sky, but it’s also just a dark hole without lots of light—I’ve had better luck with Grand Canyon my star trail images because the long shutter time allows enough light at a very clean ISO. My current favorite location for night photography is the Kilauea Caldera on Hawaii’s Big Island, which has the added advantage of its own light source and surrounding terrain that can stay black (allowing pinpoint star shots with an ISO still low enough to be manageable).

Star motion

Successful star photography is all about managing star motion—either minimizing their motion or maximizing it. Unfortunately there’s an inverse relationship between the number of stars you capture and your ability to freeze their motion—for any given ISO and f-stop, the longer your shutter is open, the more stars you’ll expose, but the more they’ll move during your exposure.

Star Trails Above the Colorado River, Desert View, Grand Canyon: Here’s a 30 minute exposure toward the North Star. Notice how little movement the North Star shows compared to the stars toward the edge of the frame.

Pinpoint stars

Pinpoint star images require (relatively) fast shutter speeds to freeze the stars’ motion; star trail images require long shutter speeds, the longer the better, to maximize star motion. (Of course it’s not the stars’ motion we’re capturing, it’s Earth’s rotation against a fixed backdrop of stars, but you already knew that.)

Some nights I shoot both pinpoint stars and star trails; other nights I only photograph pinpoint stars. Because a pinpoint star image is usually only 15 to 30 seconds, even after I’ve completed my test exposures they’re the best way to make sure I have everything right before moving on to the quite lengthy star trail exposures.

I’ve seen a formula floating around that’s supposed to ensure pinpoint stars. It’s called the “Rule of 600” and goes something like, “Divide 600 by your focal length to ensure a shutter speed that will freeze the stars.” My concern with solutions like this is that they sound far more precise than they are, and they create a false sense of security, often leading to longer or shorter exposures than necessary.

The problem is, the amount of motion is a function of (among other things) a star’s distance from the axis of rotation. For example the North Star, which is less than a degree from Earth’s north axis, will show very little motion in exposures of many minutes or even hours; Betelgeuse, on the other hand, because it’s near the celestial equator will show a significant amount of motion in just a few minutes. For pinpoint stars I think it’s more important to find an exposure that delivers enough light with the least amount of noise. So go ahead an use the Rule of 600 as a starting point, but don’t assume it’s Gospel.

What do I do? For pinpoint stars I shoot with a wide lens (28 mm or wider on a full frame) and keep my exposures under 30 seconds—motion has never been a problem for me (you can make your own determination of what is and isn’t acceptable). I know I can get usable images that clean up nicely with noise reduction software (Topaz DeNoise is my choice) at 3200 ISO. If I’m pointing north (less star motion) I’m more inclined to expose for 30 seconds if it’ll buy me a lower ISO; pointing more toward the celestial equator (east or west), my bias is usually toward a higher ISO to allow for a faster shutter speed. But the exposure is the priority, so I don’t hesitate to go all the way to ISO 3200 for 30 seconds if the light calls for it.

Bristlecone Starlight, White Mountains, California: With clouds moving in I was reluctant to chance losing the stars altogether while waiting for my exposure to complete, so I exposed this 4,000 year old as a silhouette against a sky of pinpoint stars. (Good thing, too, because not long after this capture I was chased down the mountain by nearby lightning.)

The Milky Way

Milky Way and Halemaʻumaʻu Crater, Kilauea, Hawaii

Milky Way and Halemaʻumaʻu Crater, Kilauea, Hawaii

Canon EOS 5D Mark III
15 seconds
F/2.8
ISO 3200
16 mm

The Milky Way may just be the single most beautiful everyday feature of Earth’s night sky. Sadly, increased light pollution has made it all but unknown to the vast majority of us. Once upon a time observing the Milky Way’s glowing band stretching across the sky was for most people a matter of walking out and looking up on a dark, clear night; seeing it now usually requires planning and travel.

As most know, the Milky Way is the galaxy of which our Solar System is a very insignificant piece (the Sun is one star in nearly a half trillion). When you see the Milky Way, you’re looking toward our galaxy’s center and seeing the accumulated light of billions of stars. The dark areas you see aren’t areas without stars, they’re regions of interstellar dust so dense that it obscures all starlight (the occasional pinpoint of starlight in these dark regions are nearby stars between us and the galactic center).

Spiral Galaxy (Milky look-alike): This is what our galaxy would look like from above.

Spiral Galaxy (Milky Way look-alike): This is what our galaxy would look like from above. The individual stars are nearby neighbors who just got in the way—they’re not part of the galaxy pictured. (Photo courtesy of European Southern Observatory)

Earth’s position in one of the Milky Way’s spiral arms is kind of like being in the distant suburbs of a large city. While all the discrete stars we view and imagine into constellations are the porch lights of our neighbors (technically they’re part of the Milky Way too, just as some cities have city limits that extend all the way out to the suburbs), when we view the Milky Way we’re looking beyond our neighborhood toward our galaxy’s distant, much more densely populated, urban skyline. Due to our Solar System’s skewed orientation (we don’t orbit the Sun on the same plane on which the Milky Way is laid out), parts of the Milky Way are visible regardless of the side of the Sun Earth is on.

The constellations the Milky Way “passes through” (from our perspective—in reality we’re looking through these constellations to the Milky Way center beyond) include Perseus, Cassiopeia, Lacerta, Cygnus, Aquila, Sagittarius, Ophiuchus and Scorpius, Norma, Circinus, Crux, and Carina. If you want to see it, simply pick one of these constellations, figure out when and where it will be visible (an star chart or app will do), pick a clear, moonless night, and position yourself a location far from city lights. For example, in the Northern Hemisphere Cassiopeia is visible year-round more or less opposite the Big Dipper with Polaris (the North Star) in the center—you might be able to go out tonight to see it (assuming there’s no moon and you can get away from city lights).

But the Milky Way isn’t particularly bright in Cassiopeia—for most photographers (or anyone else who appreciates beauty) it’s the Milky Way center we’re looking for. For that Northern Hemisphere viewers need to look to the southern sky, toward Sagittarius, the constellation that aligns most closely with the Milky Way’s dense (most brilliant) center. And since the Sun is in or near Sagittarius (when we look in the direction of Sagittarius, we’re also looking toward the sun) in winter, we need to wait until Earth has circled around to the other side of the sun—summer.

In other words, viewing (and photographing) the Milky Way’s bright center is a summer (-ish—late spring and early fall will work too) activity. Get out your star chart/app and find a summer night when the moon is below the horizon while Sagittarius is above it (the closer to a new moon, the better your odds). Then get yourself as far from city lights as you can (mountains or desert are great), look to the south, and prepare to be awestruck. Stand there and appreciate the view for a while—when you’re ready to photograph, follow the instructions for pinpoint stars above.

Star trails

Many people are having great success photographing star trails by combining many consecutive, relatively short exposures. In general this approach reduces noise and results in a cleaner image. But since all my images are captured in a single frame (I’m a film shooter with a digital camera), you’ll need to look elsewhere for that method.

Bristlecone Star Trails, White Mountains, California: Here I silhouetted this ancient bristlecone pine against a background of star trails.

My star trail images are usually 20 or 30 minute exposures, which I find to be more than adequate to achieve the effect I’m looking for. Start with pinpoint stars and stick with those shots until you’re happy with your composition, exposure, and focus. When you’re ready for star trails, without changing your composition, focal length, or focus (you’re on a tripod and I’m assuming you’re happy with your point star results):

  1. Turn on your camera’s long exposure noise reduction (most cameras have it, though it’s usually buried deep in the menu system). LENR isn’t necessary for pinpoint stars (though it may help slightly), but it makes a noticeable difference in star trail images. The downside of LENR is that it doubles your exposure time (it basically takes a second exposure of the same duration with the shutter closed, compares the results, and subtracts whatever it finds in both images). That means if you take a 30 minute exposure, you’ll need to wait another 30 minutes before viewing your results.
  2. Put your camera in Bulb mode. On some cameras Bulb mode is one of the choices on the Aperture Priority, Shutter Priority, Manual (and so on) dial; on others Bulb is the next step after 30 seconds in the Manual shutter speed.
  3. Now it’s time to do your exposure math. Assuming you want the same exposure (amount of light) you have in the pinpoint star images, determine how many stops of light your star trail shutter speed will add, then subtract that amount of light with some combination of lower ISO and smaller aperture (larger f-stop number). For example, if your star trail exposure is 30 seconds at ISO 3200 and f2.8, a 30 minute exposure would add 6 stops (technically a full 6 stops would be all the way to 32 minutes, but those extra two minutes are inconsequential).
  4. Now you’re ready to shoot. If your camera allows you to block the light entering through the viewfinder, now’s the time to engage that (if you don’t know what I’m talking about, you probably can’t do it, so don’t worry about it). Click the shutter button on your remote, lock it down, and check your watch or set a timer.
  5. Enjoy the view.

Processing

Before I start, let me just say that there are just about as many processing approaches as there are photographers. And there are far fewer absolute right/wrong ways to do things than you might read/hear/see. So what I’ll tell you here is the way I process a night image, rather than the way to process night image. If you already have a workflow you like, or if somebody else tells you a way you like better mine, go for it.

I wouldn’t even consider photographing night scenes in anything but raw. Not only do jpeg captures reduce your margin for error, they make processing decisions that are difficult to impossible to reverse.

Lightroom

  • Cool the color temperature: Since I photograph everything with auto white balance, in my raw processor (Lightroom) the first thing I do with a night image is cool the color temperature to introduce a little blue that gives the scene a more night-like feel. The temperature varies from image to image, but it’s usually in the 3,000-4,000 degrees range.
  • Noise reduction: Lightroom/Camera Raw noise reduction is much improved, but I don’t use it as my final noise solution. Rather, I do a subtle de-noise with the Lightroom color and luminosity sliders (you’ll notice much more difference with the luminosity slider than you will with the color slider),
  • Clarity: The clarity slider brings out stars like magic, but you need to be careful about the noise it subtly (insidiously) increases right along with the stars. I’ve found that it’s easy to get so excited by what Clarity does to your stars that you overlook the more subtle damage it does to the noise in the image. I generally magnify my view to 1:1 and slowly pull my Clarity slider to the right, concentrating on the noise and ignoring the stars (as much as I can). I’ll be able to fix a little noise later with my Photoshop de-noise plugin, but I just try to be careful not to create additional problems for myself.
  • Standard Lightroom processing: While the above bullets are points of particular emphasis, that doesn’t mean that I don’t also apply the rest of my Lightroom workflow to a night image. Exposure, Highlights, Vibrance, Crop, and so on may or may not have their place in any given image.

Photoshop

  • Noise reduction (since NR is an art in itself, I won’t go into it in great deal here): I use Topaz DeNoise; it’s the first thing I do when I bring an image into Photoshop. Depending on the rest of frame, I often select the areas most prone to noise (shadows, sky, clouds, etc.) and process them separately from the areas with lots of detail (which may not get an NR treatment at all, or a much gentler treatment that preserves detail).
  • Dodge/burn: I find that many night images benefit from subtle dodge/burn brush strokes to smooth tone differences in the sky. For example, I often have to clean up slight vignetting, likely the result of shooting wide open (at an aperture far from the lens’s best). And sometimes I like to moderate the tone difference between the horizon line and the top of the frame. Another problem I occasionally encounter is a subtle brightness on one side of the frame or the other, caused by extraneous light (such as moonlight, nearby artificial light) leaking in from outside the frame.
  • Content Aware Fill: The longer the exposure, the greater the chance of something unwelcome finding its way into your frame. Headlights and airplanes are by far the biggest offender. But since the advent of Content Aware Fill, I no longer stress about these things.
  • Sharpen: Always my final step, I never sharpen an image until it’s sized for output. Especially with night photography, I selectively sharpen only those areas with important detail—dark shadows are never sharpened. And be careful when sharpening the sky—as with the Clarity slider, sharpening can make the stars pop but at the cost of extra noise. One trick I sometimes do after sharpening is brush with the history slider at around 85 percent (100 percent can sometimes create visible transitions) those areas of the sky without significant stars.
  • Standard Photoshop processing: While the above bullets are points of particular emphasis, that doesn’t mean that I don’t also apply the rest of my Photoshop workflow to a night image.

15 Comments on “Starlight

  1. Gary, what an amazing shot! The cool and warm colors, the volcano and our distant galaxy all combine for a stunning image. It’s hard to comprehend the billions of stars just in our own galaxy. And thank you for the wonderful lessons. Between your blog and attending workshops, you’ve had an enormous impact on my development as a photographer.

    • Thanks so much, Chuck. It really is my pleasure. It’s so much fun to see the progress of the photographers who attend multiple workshops. I know I can’t take full credit, but it’s gratifying to know that I’m being heard. 🙂

  2. Just by way of asking Gary, does having a UV-Haze filter on a 35mm’ f1.8 lens make that much difference in quality of shots for capturing stars? We’ve got a Nikon D5100 and are trying to develop a good set of lenses to take around for shen we try to do this kind of thing. Thanks again for the very informative blog!

    • I haven’t used a UV filter in years and have never done a with/without test for its efficacy. When I do night photography I try to minimize the glass between the stars and my sensor and remove all filters.

  3. Great write up and tips Gary.

    An extra tip I learned from working working with telescopes (24″ at WKU), use of dim red flashlights to help keep your night vision. That’s also why Navy ship have red passageways at night.

    I use a Petzl headlamp with a red filter at the dim between exposures do I’m not fumbling around. When I begin my exposure, the timer is at 2 secs to prevent vibration and gives me time to shut off my head lamp.

    Again, great write up and super wonderful images!

  4. Gary,
    In your little illustration of computing star trail exposure time of six stops, would you advise taking the extra time out as ISO or aperture. It seems to me that ISO would be the choice, since it also reduces noise.

    Mike

    • That’s right, Mike, I would opt for subtracting ISO over aperture, unless you know that your lens is particularly bad wide open (always a possibility). If you do want to go one stop down from wide open, you could probably get away with ISO 200 with negligible extra noise.

      Gary

  5. Hi Gary

    I have recently bag focusing on night photography. I find myself struggling with trying to limit the amount of post-production editing, yet I have been bumping up against graininess as a result of (I am assuming) an ISO of 1600+ I like my compositions. I love shooting the night sky. I am just having a hard time with the rough looking image that results. The tips in this post are great. Any additional advice for an amateur would be much appreciated. Thanks for all you do.

    • Hi Chris. When you shoot at night, you just have to accept that there will be some processing involved. The faster your lens, the less noise you’ll get (because your shutter speeds can be faster and your ISO lower). For dark sky photography (no moonlight), I recommend f2.8 or faster, the faster the better (and of course, no polarizer). I have an f2 28mm Zeiss lens that’s almost exclusively for night photography. You also should turn on your camera’s long exposure noise reduction.

      But even with these steps, you’ll need to deal with noise. Lightroom and Photoshop noise processing are pretty good, but I use Topaz DeNoise. You can also do a combination of both. Noise processing is a dark art, but it gets better with practice. Keep experimenting until you figure out the settings that work best.

      Good luck.

  6. Just left Grand Canyon, now in Zion and hoping to capture some Star trails. Your article is by far the most clearly written and best explained, not to mention timely! Thank you.
    Looking forward to meeting you and learning more techniques in Yosemite during the Crooked Tree photo workshop.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: