Hidden Treasures
Posted on January 8, 2026
Clinging Tree, Upper Yosemite Fall, Yosemite
Sony a7R V
Sony 100-400 GM and 1.4X teleconverter (560mm)
ISO 800
f/11
1/1600 second
I’m aware that most of the images I share feature familiar subjects and eye-grabbing vistas that (justifiably) attract thousands of daily visitors and inspire millions of photographs—Nature’s celebrities. But that’s not a complete reflection of my personal photographic instincts. There are several reasons the subjects I share skew toward more acclaimed beauty: for example, the relatively close proximity of that beauty to my home in Northern California; and the obvious fact that I make my living leading photography workshops that I need to fill.
Though celebrated subjects are coveted by the vast majority of nature photographers, today I’d like to issue a shout-out to “ordinary” beauty that doesn’t jump out and grab the eye of everyone present (and doesn’t necessarily inspire people to sign up for workshops). I’m talking specifically about Nature’s hidden treasures that require the photographer to look closer and work harder to uncover. These little scenes may not garner the acclaim of their more spectacular counterparts, but I’ve come to realize that I’m never more content than I am when I photograph them.
Given Yosemite’s proximity, and the fact that I lead 4 to 6 Yosemite photo workshops each year, I probably spend more of my photography time there than anyplace else. But as the years click past, I find that I take my camera out in Yosemite far less than I once did—not because I find it less beautiful, or that I’ve tired of photographing it, but simply because it’s become harder and harder to find the unique scenes I covet. And of course when leading a workshop, my priority is never my own photography. I have to honor the fact that most of my workshop students want to photograph the beautiful Yosemite they’ve seen in pictures, not a leaf, or flower, or tree they could probably find at home.
That said, one of the points I emphasize to my students is trying to make the iconic shots that drew them their starting point, not their goal. So we spend a lot of time, both in the field and in the daily image reviews, on how to see and use the less obvious elements in a scene, with the goal of creating images that are uniquely their own. It’s a mindset that once established, starts becoming automatic.
To jumpstart that mindset, I have certain subtle features I point out at many of the locations I take my groups to—hidden treasures I’ve uncovered over the years that are potentially powerful but easily missed. One of my favorites is this little tree in front of Upper Yosemite Fall, only visible from a certain location on the trail to the bridge beneath Lower Yosemite Fall. It’s been on my radar for decades, though I rarely photograph it anymore. In fact, I hardly ever take my camera on my groups’ walks to Lower Yosemite Fall anymore. But in April of last year, with the fall booming and thin clouds diffusing the morning sunlight, I grabbed my camera bag with the sole purpose of shooting this tree again.
For me this is a telephoto shot, the longer the better. So on the walk back down from the bridge (where we photographed a rainbow at the base of Lower Yosemite Fall), I pulled out my 100-400 lens, added my 1.4X teleconverter, and went right to work. To avoid losing the tree against the dark, wet granite, the key here is waiting until the wind blows the water behind the tree. There was so much water on this spring morning that I rarely had to wait long.
I’m sure I clicked more than 50 frames, repositioning the tree from time to time in both horizontal and vertical orientation. Each time I recomposed, I shot at least a half dozen frames just to get different background water patterns—it’s amazing how much it changes from one second to the next. Pretty soon others in the group joined me, and it was fun watching them get excited about this anonymous little tree that’s so easily overlooked.
Of course the moral of this story is that there are hidden treasures like this everywhere, just waiting to be discovered—and hunting for them is half the fun.
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
Hidden Treasures
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE (best viewed on a computer)
Looking Back at 2025: I Was There
Posted on December 30, 2025
Galleries are better viewed on a computer than a smartphone
One of my favorite things to do at year’s end is to look back at the images that made the departing year especially memorable. And each year, I think to myself, ‘Wow—this was probably my best year ever and there’s no way I’ll be able match that success next year.’ You’d think maybe I’d learn after more than two decades of saying the same thing at the end of each year that maybe my pessimism is unjustified, yet here I am wrapping up another year doubting that I’ll ever be able to top it….
The true reason I’m always irrationally exuberant about the most recent year is that I still love what I do as much as I did the day I started. (That is, a lot.) Both the sights, and the people I share them with. I often think in terms of “I was there” moments in my photography life: experiences in Nature that will be forever etched on my brain—not simply for visual component and the resulting images, but for the entire experience, from the anticipation or surprise (depending on whether I planned for the latest spectacle or not), to the people I enjoyed it with, to the euphoria that follows. That applies whether the sight was as rare as a total solar eclipse or dazzling comet, or simply a sunrise/sunset or lightning display that was so spectacular its memory supercedes all that preceded it.
Sometimes these “I was there” experiences are (more or less) predictable (like a rising moon, eclipse, or comet), other times they’re completely unexpected (like a vivid sunrise or rainbow). I don’t get one every year, and in fact they’re rare enough if I even get one in any given year, I consider it a win. In 2025, I had three (or more, depending on how I count them—read on for an explanation).
I’ve already had a couple of Iceland aurora displays that qualify, and I added another one in February. This year’s, in addition to rivaling the best aurora shows I’ve witnessed (for both color and intensity), was especially memorable because it was so unexpected. I blogged about it three times:
(To appreciate the expansive spread of the aurora that night, note that each of the featured images in these three posts was captured facing a different direction.)
Most recent was the Kilauea eruption in September. I’ve witnessed many Kilauea eruptions (some of which have made my “I was there” list), but none that compare to this one. I have three blog posts dedicated to this experience:
- Kilauea Eruption Episode 33, Part 1: So You’re Telling Me There’s a Chance… (this was actually a precursor event leading up to the main eruption)
- Kilauea Eruption Episode 33, Part 2: Grand Finale
- A Moving Experience
But the “I was there” experience that stands out most, not just for 2025 but for my entire life, is my storm chasing trip in June. Even though here I’ve lumped the entire storm chasing experience into a single qualifying event, I could just as easily break it into multiple days—at least two, with several others coming close as well. The two most significant days of that trip are what everyone in the group started calling simply, “the tornado day,” and then “the supercell” day a couple of days later.
Our tornado day was notable for me less for the photography and more because I got to check off a lifelong bucket list item: See a tornado. Our supercell day may have included the single most photographically productive two hours of my life. Check it out:
Here are the seven blog posts I wrote dedicated to this trip:
- Storm Chasing Diary: Hit the Ground Running
- Storm Chasing Diary: My First Tornado
- Storm Chasing Diary: “Large Cloud in the Sky”
- Storm Chasing Diary: Safety, Schmafety
- Storm Chasing Diary: More Tornadoes
- Storm Chasing Diary: Lucky Strike
- Storm Chasing Diary: Saving the Best For Last
I’m afraid that breaking the year down into a series of grand “I was there” events risks minimizing the other beautiful sights I got to witness. Yosemite, New Zealand, Grand Canyon, the Eastern Sierra, and the Tetons were all the best versions of their spectacular selves, as you can see for yourself in the gallery below. Because I resist ranking my images, or picking specific favorites, I’m sharing them here in random order. I hope you take the time to review the gallery, and please feel free to share with me the one (or ones) you like most.
Now, on to 2026….
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
(It has come to my attention that my galleries don’t display well on some smartphones—I’m looking into this, but in the meantime I strongly recommend viewing them on a computer.)
2025 Highlights
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE
Night Vision
Posted on December 26, 2025
Looking North, Aurora and Big Dipper, Snaefellsnes Peninsula, Iceland
Sony α1
Sony 14mm f/1.8 GM
ISO 3200
f/1.8
4 seconds
When it comes to natural beauty, I’ll be the first to admit that there is nothing like being there. In person we get to enjoy all the movement and simultaneous multi-sensory input that’s lost in a still image—not to mention the synergistic amplification of awe and joy that comes with witnessing a special event with others. But let’s pause for a moment to appreciate what a camera brings to those experiences—more than just the way a camera freezes our a memory in time, a camera actually reveals aspects of the natural world that our eyes can’t see.
This advantage is particularly significant when the sun is down and our eyes struggle to wring photons from the darkness. Though the light capturing capability of the human eye is superior, our eyes have to start over with the passing each (infinitesimal) instant. A digital sensor accumulates incoming photons for whatever duration we choose, allowing exposures of just a few seconds to reveal a night sky brimming with more stars than we imagined possible—the longer the exposure, the more stars we see.
Perhaps even more powerful than unveiling hidden stars, a also camera reveals color that, while unseen by our eyes, is nevertheless very real. The human eye functions through a collaboration of two kinds of photoreceptors: rods and cones. In daylight, the cones do a wonderful job resolving our world’s exquisite detail and vivid color, pulling this visual information from a scene’s darkest shadows and brightest highlights much better than a digital sensor can. The cost of our cones’ efficiency is that they require lots of light to function at their best.
Milky Way Reflection, Colorado River, Grand Canyon
But things change in the dark. Evolution has determined that at night, job-one for our eyes is keeping us safe from obstacles and predators, giving our vision a strong bias toward detecting shape and movement. To achieve this, the bulk of the light gathering job is turned over to our eyes’ rods, which require very few photons to detect essential contrast and motion, but are blind to the color and detail our light-thirsty cones see. So, even in night’s feeble light, humans are able to avoid shapes well enough to navigate, and to detect pouncing predators, but we’re denied the night sky’s exquisite color and detail.
A digital sensor, on the other hand, is an equal opportunity light collector, capturing the color and detail our eyes miss—when given enough time. To the unaided eye on a dark night, the center of the Milky Way is a distinct but still faint cloud of light. But in the right hands (metaphorically speaking—you’ll need a tripod), a camera reveals magnificent color woven into meandering bands of star-sprinkled dust forming our galaxy’s core. Following the hazy glow away from the core reveals that a dimmer band of the Milky Way stretching from horizon to horizon.
Comet Tsuchinshan–ATLAS and Mt. Whitney, Alabama Hills, California
And it’s not just more stars that a camera pulls out. A naked-eye comet, while undeniably beautiful to behold, enters an entirely new dimension of beauty in a camera: it brightens, the tail doubles or triples in length, and sometime bluish ion tail emerges from the darkness.
Moonbow, Lower Yosemite Fall, Yosemite
One of the best examples of the camera’s color rendering superiority is a moonbow, a lunar rainbow that appears to our eyes as a shimmering silver band when rain or mist at the base of a waterfall is illuminated by the light of a full moon. Captured by a camera, using a long exposure, this monochrome band transforms into an arcing prism in living color.
And then there’s an aurora, a kinetic display of multi-color shafts and sheets that is arguably the most beautiful natural sight Nature delivers. Without denying the fact that no camera can match the experience of witnessing a dancing aurora with your own eyes, a camera exposes color that enhances the aurora magic even more.
I am extremely grateful for the many opportunities I’ve had to simultaneously view and photograph an active aurora. My most recent aurora experience was the show Don Smith and I shared with our Iceland workshop group in February. We were settled in at our remote hotel in an uninhabited region of the Snaefellsnes Peninsula in Iceland, but a forecast of cloudy skies and minimal aurora activity had sent everyone to their rooms shortly after dinner. But just a couple of hours later, the group WhatsApp thread lit up with messages from a couple of participants who had briefly ventured out front and saw northern lights.
Skeptical, I nevertheless armored up with winter wear and grabbed my camera bag and hustled out the front door. Crossing the road to where a few in our group had already set up I glanced skyward expecting no more than a faint glow near the horizon, but stared in disbelief at the display overhead. After grabbing a spot (in two feet of snow) along the fence paralleling the road, I quickly set up, then stepped back from my camera to take attendance.
With each shape bundled against the cold and pretty much anonymous in the moonless darkness, and a handful other hotel guests mixed in, it took a while to determine who was present and who was missing. Once I sorted that out, after a few text messages and phone calls I was (relatively) confident everyone had been notified (turns out we missed one person who I thought was out there with us) and got down to serious picture taking business. Soon as the display intensified, and the giddiness that had initially engulfed us all gave way to quiet awe, broken only by the frequent click of shutters.
In a good aurora display, it is possible to see some color with your eyes, but whatever amount of color your eyes pick up, your camera will see more. All of the color our eyes saw this night was faint green, but my camera revealed a good mix of red with the green—all far more vivid.
I’ve witnessed enough auroras to have an idea of what the cameras of our group’s first-timers were adding to their experience. While the awe of an aurora never goes away, the first-time viewers had the added thrill of realizing the actual color their eyes couldn’t see, and looking skyward knowing the color in their camera was really there. It wasn’t just our images’ color our eyes—even our cameras’ live-view display showed much more color.
Most of my images were targeted northwest and directly across a snowy field toward the most prominent mountains, but when a spiraling, multi-layered shaft shot skyward to my right, I switched my camera to vertical and pointed more due north. In my very first frame the Big Dipper jumped out at me, and I decided to compose my next frame to make it and the North Star (the brightest star in the upper left) a more prominent part of my image.
This turned out to be one of the best aurora displays I’ve ever seen, not just for its brightness and color, but also for its motion and range, at various times coloring the sky north, east, and west. It was like looking up from inside a lava lamp, watching the glowing shapes twist and fold on themselves in all directions. Just one more reminder of the blessings Nature bestows, and my good fortune to witness them.
Join Don and Me for This Year’s Iceland Aurora Workshop
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
Night Vision
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE
-
- Aurora Reflection, Glacier Lagoon, Iceland
-
- Heaven Sent, Comet Tsuchinshan–ATLAS Above the Sierra Crest, Alabama Hills
-
- New Zealand Night, Milky Way Over Tasman Lake
-
- Moonbow and Big Dipper, Lower Yosemite Fall, Yosemite
-
- Night Lights, Snaefellsnes Peninsula, Iceland
-
- Night Moves, Comet Tsuchinshan–ATLAS and Mt. Whitney, Alabama Hills
-
- Milky Way Reflection, South Tufa, Mono Lake
-
- Nature’s Light Show, Aurora Over Dyrhólaey Coast, Iceland
-
- Glow, Milky Way Above Kilauea, Hawaii
-
- Wings of Angels, Aurora Above Dyrhólaey, Iceland
-
- Comet NEOWISE and the Big Dipper, Grandview Point, Grand Canyon
-
- Green Curtain, Kirkjufell Aurora, Iceland
-
- Aurora Streaks, Glacier Lagoon, Iceland
-
- Comet PanSTARRS and New Moon, Haleakala, Maui
-
- Silent Night, Milky Way Above Lake Wakatipu, New Zealand
-
- The Green Night, Aurora Above Kirkjufell, Iceland
-
- Milky Way and Small Magellanic Cloud, Lake Wakatipu, New Zealand
-
- Moonbow, Lower Yosemite Fall, Yosemite
-
- Milky Way Reflection, Colorado River, Grand Canyon
-
- Swoosh, Northern Lights Over Kirkjufell, Iceland
-
- Moonbow and Big Dipper, Lower Yosemite Fall, Yosemite
-
- Neon Night, Aurora and Glacier Lagoon, Iceland
-
- Star Spangled Night, Milky Way and Tasman Lake, New Zealand
-
- Yosemite Dawn, Comet Neowise and Venus from Glacier Point, Yosemite
-
- Celestial Reflection, Milky Way Over the Colorado River, Grand Canyon
-
- Follow the Lights, Snaefellsnes Peninsula, Iceland
-
- Dark Night, Milky Way Above the Colorado River, Grand Canyon
-
- Northern Lights, Kirkjufell, Iceland
-
- Winter Night, Milky Way Above Tasman Lake, New Zealand
-
- Neowise and the Big Dipper Above El Capitan, Taft Point, Yosemite
-
- Northern Lights Reflection, Aurora and Glacier Lagoon, Iceland
-
- Fire on High, Kilauea and Milky Way, Hawaii
-
- Looking North, Aurora and Big Dipper, Snaefellsnes Peninsula, Iceland
-
- Stairway to Heaven, Milky Way Over the Puna Coast, Hawaii
-
- Comet Tsuchinshan–ATLAS and Mt. Whitney, Alabama Hills, California
A Moving Experience
Posted on December 18, 2025
Fire on High, Kilauea Eruption 33, Hawaii
Sony α1
Sony 16-35 GM II
1/50 seconds
F/8
ISO 200
I’ve been photographing Kilauea’s eruptions, in many forms, for 15 years, but never anything close to the spectacular display my workshop group and I witnessed in September. It wouldn’t be hyperbole to say that this was one of the most memorable experiences of my life. (I’ve said that about Kilauea eruptions before, but each time I say it, Kilauea seems to say, “Oh yeah? Hold my Mai Tai.”)
As a photographer who obsesses about controlling every pixel in my frame, and who (semi-) jokingly asserts that I don’t photograph anything that moves, there was a lot going on atop Kilauea this morning. Anybody up there with a camera could have snapped a few frames and captured something worthy of sharing, but whether it’s a vivid sunset, dancing aurora, or fountaining lava, serious photographers need to separate themselves from the “anybodys” and pay attention to the little things easily overlooked in the thrill of the moment. This morning on Kilauea, with an obvious focal point and empty foreground, the biggest (and most easily overlooked) challenge was the constant motion in the scene.
Let’s review: Photography is the futile attempt to convey a dynamic world using a static medium. Though that’s literally impossible, what is possible is conveying the illusion of motion—that is, capturing the scene in a way that enables viewers to infer its motion. Finding the shutter speed that freezes a moving subject in place or renders it with some degree of motion blur, while getting the light perfect, is a basic photography skill that simply requires mastery of the three exposure variables.
Motion in a landscape image can take many forms, some easier to address than others. Though waterfalls and whitewater rapids may move fast, at least they stay in one place while the water moves within. But other natural subjects move more unpredictably. Lightning, for example, comes and goes so suddenly, I never even consider using my own reflex/reaction skills to freeze its transient existence—I simply connect my Lightning Trigger, aim my camera, and wait for my trigger and camera to do the work. Ocean waves, while less organized than whitewater, are at least predictable enough to anticipate and time—that said, I generally prefer to simply shoot a series of wave images with varied timing and motion effects, then pick my favorite later.
Somewhere between lightning and waves on the predictable/random continuum are atmospheric phenomena like the northern lights, and regular old clouds. Though they’re in constant (seemingly) random motion, that motion is usually more my speed—slow enough to anticipate and adjust my composition and exposure without feeling too rushed.
But it’s not just about how you render the motion—another complicating factor is paying attention to subjects that don’t stay put: a composition that was perfect seconds ago could be completely out of whack right now. Which happens to be the biggest challenge this memorable morning in Hawaii.
Now might be a good time to mention that part of my desire to control my entire frame makes me especially obsessive about both the borders of my images, as well as the relationships of the elements in my frame that draw the eye. That means trying to avoid cutting strong elements on the edges of my frame, creating a sense of connection and balance between strong visual elements, and avoiding (or minimizing) visual elements that compete with my subject or subjects. So when my subjects are in motion, as they were on Kilauea this morning, I need to monitor and adjust continuously.
Arriving with my workshop group several hours before sunrise, the total darkness meant I only had to contend with 800-foot explosive lava fountains and the lava rivers surrounded by a sea of black. The lava fountains, while exploding violently and pretty much non-stop, were far enough away that they seemed to be moving in slow motion. The lava rivers, though constantly ebbing, flowing, and changing course, moved slowly enough to be relatively manageable too.
Fountain of Fire, Kilauea Eruption, Hawaii
My goal was to freeze the lava’s motion in place, and soon I settled on a shutter speed I was confident would do that even at my longest focal length. With the unchanging light (dark) and a shutter speed I knew was fine, it wasn’t long before I found a rhythm, complementing compositions centered on the “stationary” lava fountain (the lava was moving, but the fountain stayed in one place) with the current position of the flowing lava rivers, then timing my shutter click for when the latest fountain peaked or spread most dramatically. I worked this way for a couple of hours, mostly using my 100-400 and 1.4X teleconverter, zooming in and out and switching between horizontal and vertical compositions.
Things changed when sunrise started painting the sky pink and revealing a previously unseen plume of billowing smoke, vapor, and tephra. Suddenly, my priorities switched to wide angle to capture all the additional beauty brought by the increasing light. And just as suddenly, I had to adjust the compositional imperatives underlying my prior rhythm, now factoring into the mix the wind-whipped smoky plume tower that expanded and shifted by the second, the pink clouds, and even new detail on the caldera floor. And with the rapidly brightening sky, an exposure that worked 30 seconds ago, now blew out the sunlit highlights. Not only that, I knew the plume’s gorgeous warm light was peaking and would only last for another minute or two, further ratcheting up my urgency.
Switching to my 16-35 lens, I framed up a completely new composition and adjusted to a new combination of motion considerations. In this case, including the lava and rising plume were no-brainers, but the goal should be more than simply taking a picture that includes both—everything needs to work together to create something that stands out from the thousands of other images captured at the caldera that morning.
Managing all of a scene’s moving parts is what good photographers are supposed to do. That said, I notice—both in my workshops and online—that many photographers seem so focused on their scene’s one or two most prominent features that they lose track of still important secondary and tertiary elements. And when one or more of those less essential elements is moving, for example waves or clouds, their new position is easily overlooked, leading to random and often less than ideal results.
In this case, while keeping an eye on the active lava as I’d done all morning, I suddenly also needed to keep track of an expanding smoke plume that was in constant motion, illuminated by ever-changing sunlight. While not especially difficult if you’re paying attention, this doesn’t just happen automatically (and I have the pictures to prove it).
Keeping my borders as clean as possible became a prime concern, so I kept a constant eye on the shifting smoke plume to avoid cutting it off. On the left and top I just needed to keep the plume off the borders of my frame; since the wind had stretched the smoke far beyond any reasonable frame on the right side, I also needed to find the best place to cut that side with the right border. And as with my rapidly changing exposure, a composition that worked one second might need to be completely adjusted the next.
I tried to go just wide enough on the right to include all of the main (and most dramatic!) vertical section of the sunlit plume, and on the right went just a little wider than that to include that one small splash light—any farther right would have shrunk my subjects while adding nothing more than a homogenous horizontal band of brownish-gray smoke.
The result of all these machinations is this wide vertical frame that includes the fountaining and flowing lava that was the star of the show that morning, plus all of the sunlit portion of the beautiful smoke plume. Accomplishing this was not rocket science, and I’m not pretending to be special for achieving it. But I do think photographers often fall down when they get so caught up in the majesty of the moment that they fail to take that one extra step to account for the scene’s motion, and the importance of those subtle changes from one frame to the next.
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
World in Motion
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE
A Diamond in the Surf
Posted on December 11, 2025
Flow, Diamond Beach, Iceland
Sony a7R V
Sony 24-105 G
2 1/2 seconds
F/16
ISO 400
With a break in my workshop schedule (and to prepare for my upcoming 2025 Highlights post), I’m working hard to catch up on this year’s unprocessed images. Moving more or less chronologically, I’m really having a blast—such a blast that balancing this processing with family Holiday priorities and the endless demands of running a business, my weekly blog schedule has slipped a bit. But be patient, because I’m pretty excited about some of the images I have queued up to share, and am hoping I can crank out the blog posts to do them justice….
In addition to finding new images to get excited about, I never tire of revisiting locations (in general) and specific shoots (in particular) through my raw images. For example, returning to Iceland and remembering the sights and people Don Smith and I shared it all with really has me itching for our return in March. This year’s highlight was probably our exceptional and unexpected(!) Iceland northern lights experience on the workshop’s second night, a display that fostered a group-wide buzz that persisted throughout the workshop. So of course as soon as I returned home, I went straight to work processing those aurora images, then moved on to a handful of other new Iceland locations that had excited me, before my Yosemite winter workshop force me to focus on other priorities. After all that, Diamond Beach was just one of many Iceland locations that remained unprocessed, shrinking in my memory to the point where my first thought upon revisiting them was, Oh yeah…
Diamond beach is a long stretch of black sand spanning Glacier Lagoon’s narrow outlet to the Atlantic. As spectacular as all that black sand is, given the island’s volcanic origins, it’s simply standard equipment the Iceland coast. But garnish that black sand with large chunks of translucent blue ice, then stir it all up every few seconds with vigorous surf, and you have the recipe for a special visual treat.
The Diamond Beach ice you photograph today could very well be the Glacier Lagoon ice you photographed yesterday. Its origins are Jokulsarlon Glacier, which drains into Glacier Lagoon year-round. When conditions are right, in addition to continuous runoff, much larger ice chunks calve from the glacier and bob across the lagoon, slowly melting as they go. Eventually these icebergs have shrunk enough to fit into the channel that splits Diamond Beach as it drains into the ocean (each time we visit, we eyeball the beach from the highway and decide whether we want to be east or west of the channel). Once the ice makes it out to the sea, tides and active surf push it up onto the beach.
The prime goal at Diamond Beach is capturing motion blur in waving wash around the ice. I can tell you from experience that this is much easier said than done (and I have the images to prove it), because many variables need to align for success.
For starters, the light needs to be right. Ideal is the soft light beneath clouds or twilight, anabling the multi-second exposures these sweeping wave shots require (a neutral density filter can enable these shots in sunlight, but I’m not crazy about mixing harsh light with soft water). By arriving at Diamond Beach well before sunrise, even when the sky is clear we enjoy a half hour or more of gentle light before the sun arrives. (Another great thing about sunrise at Diamond Beach is that there aren’t a ton of tourists yet—it’s definitely far from empty, but once the tourists start swarming, photography becomes much more difficult.) When the sun comes out, I usually forgo the blurred water in favor of sunstar images that feature beautifully backlit ice. And if we’re lucky enough to get overcast, we can spend the entire morning making the intimate ice and flowing surf images everyone covets.
But even when the light is perfect, Diamond Beach can be a challenge. At the risk of stating the obvious, without ice, it’s just another beach (Diamond Beach without “diamonds” is just Beach), and the amount of ice varies a lot from year-to-year. Sometimes there’s hardly an ice cube to be seen. Other times, high tide and big waves have pushed all the ice to a high-and-dry, elevated flat platform just above the beach. One year we (the trip leaders) had to lug a few chunks from up there down to the surf just so our group had a chance to photograph ice with waves.
And ample ice on the beach by itself still isn’t enough when the tide’s and the waves don’t reach the ice. This is why I used to hope for high tide at Diamond Beach, the higher the better—that is, until one January morning when we arrived at high tide and found the surf so big and violent that we didn’t dare venture anywhere near the water. Instead, not wishing to be swept into the frigid North Atlantic, the group set up at an elevated “safe” vantage point and used moderate telephoto lenses (like a 24-105 or 70-200), only to be forced to completely reset our understanding of the term “rogue wave.”
And just when I believed I’d run out of obstacles to hinder the shot at Diamond Beach, our bus hit a reindeer on the way to our sunrise shoot, forcing us to turn around and limp back to the hotel (though we did make it for sunset that evening). So yeah, lots of stars need to align for Diamond Beach success.
But honestly, I’ve been shooting here long enough to know that there’s no substitute for just plain experience. Simply getting shots of ice and blurred water isn’t that hard, but finding the right ice subject, framing it perfectly, choosing the ideal shutter speed for the desired motion effect, timing the shutter-click for the best flow pattern around the ice, and avoiding wave-induced motion blur in the ice, is all a lot of balls to keep in the air simultaneously. Oh yeah—try keeping all those photography balls airborne while keeping one eye on aggressive and relentless surf that can soak you and your gear with little warning. Fortunately, as with most things, this all gets easier with each attempt.
This year, after more than a dozen Diamond Beach visits, reviewing my images, I remembered feelings of finally being in control and working proactively (instead of reacting and trying to adjust to continual failures) out there returned.
Because Diamond Beach stretches quite some distance, a workshop group becomes quite spread out almost immediately. So on the drive to the beach before each visit, Don and I share our own experience-based insights and answer questions while we’re all still together. While there’s no substitute for firsthand experience, this little jump-start does seem to increase the group’s success rate. This year’s mini training session continued as everyone bundled up and prepared for their assault on the beach, but pretty soon the bus was empty and I started getting myself ready (a rather time consuming process in Iceland in winter). I intentionally took my time so I could be the last one out there, slowly advancing along the beach and checking on everyone as I went. (Don and I don’t stick together out there, but I know he does the same thing.)
At the beach it was instantly clear that we had plenty of ice, the tide was high enough, and the surf just about right. For the first hour or so, between students I stopped to fire off a frame or two a handful of times, but my prime focus was making sure everyone was doing okay. Once satisfied that people we comfortable with what they were doing and content with what they’d found, I got a little more serious about finding subjects of my own. Even though I’d taken very few pictures to that point, the overcast sky gave me confidence that I had plenty of quality time remaining.
With ideal conditions like this, I look for ice that’s planted firmly in the sand, but close enough to the water for waves to reach it from time to time. Too far inland and there’s no water around the ice to blur; too far into the surf and the ice doesn’t stay put through an exposure.
In size terms we can all relate to, most of the ice we photograph tends to range from small microwave oven to full-size refrigerator—much smaller that and they move around too much; much larger and they can’t make it in close enough.
The mini-iceberg I share today was a little smaller than a small coffee table—not huge, but enough mass to resist shifting or rocking with the slightest wave pressure. After identifying it as a potential subject, I circled (not completely—I’d never put my back to the ocean) until I found the perspective I liked best, set up my tripod 20 or so feet away, trained my 24-105 lens on it, then framed up a composition. I found the exposure-setting combination that gave me a good histogram with ample depth of field at a shutter speed around 2 seconds (sometimes a little long, sometimes a little shorter). Then I stood and waited for the waves to arrive.
In the simplest possible terms, there are two opportunities when photographing waves sweeping around fixed ice: washing in, and washing back out. I usually prefer waiting until a wave is on its way out—not only does this provide a better (in my opinion) motion effect, the water has a little less force, making it less likely to introduce any motion blur in my subject. And after years of trying this, I’ve decided that exposures in the 1 – 3 second range seem to work best.
But anything with moving water is never a one-and-done thing. After each click I check the image on my LCD to identify motion effect and its timing, then do my best to avoid the effects I don’t like, and duplicate the effects I do like. I almost always, as I did with this subject, take at least a dozen shots (unless waves sweep my subject away, always a possibility). Every single frame is different, but it’s better to have too many choices than not enough. On the other hand (and this is a particular problem for me), unless I’m waiting for specific event (like a wave of a certain size or direction), I have to remind myself not to lock in on one subject so long that I miss out on opportunities elsewhere.
The image I chose to process and share today is of a wave on its way back out. And though almost a year later I have no specific memory of its capture, I can tell by the time of its capture (after sunrise) and my exposure settings that I used my Breakthrough 6-stop dark polarizer to enable the longer shutter speed necessary for wave effect I sought—in this case, 2 1/2 seconds.
As this image makes abundantly clear, perhaps the most striking feature of glacial ice is its not-so-subtle blue. Contrary to popular opinion, this blueness is not reflected color from the sky (the sky this morning was cloud-gray), it’s a quality of the ice’s glacial origins. If you paid attention during high school (or earlier?) science class, you know glaciers form from snow accumulated over hundreds or thousands of years. While air trapped in fallen snow makes it opaque, subjecting this snow to centuries of pressure from the accumulated weight above compresses it and forces out virtually all the air, leaving nothing but translucent ice crystals. This glacial ice is so dense, it absorbs all but the shortest wavelengths of visible light that enter. The only wavelengths not absorbed are the blue ones, which instead are scattered back to our eyes: blue ice. (Of course as you can see in some pictures in my Diamond Beach gallery below, ice infused with direct sunlight will take on the sun’s yellow/gold hue).
Diamonds in the Surf
Plot Twist
Posted on December 2, 2025
Afloat, Leaves on the Merced River, Yosemite
Canon EOS-1Ds Mark II
Canon 100-400 f/4 USM
1/5 second
F/9
ISO 400
One overcast autumn evening in Yosemite, I wandered an isolated trail on the bank of the Merced River with my 100-400 lens, searching for intimate scenes to isolate. Spotting an assortment of colorful leaves clinging to a beautifully textured log, an opportunity materialized in my mind. Though my eyes could see the log and leaves mingling with a reflection of overhanging branches and yellow trees lining the far riverbank, a simple twist of my polarizer erased the reflections and darkened the water. As my eyes adjusted to the change, submerged branches and rocks appeared where the reflection had been. Though more subtle than the reflection, I still found these new elements distracting, but also knew that slightly underexposing the scene would be enough to blacken the water, completely eliminating these distractions and make an image that was entirely about the log and clinging leaves.
As I evaluated the scene and tried a few compositions, a leaf floated by just beyond the log and I realized that by timing my exposure just right, I could separate the next drifting leaf from the log, making it appear suspended in an inky void. So, once I was satisfied with my composition, instead of clicking a nice little image of the scene moving on, I parked myself and waited for that perfectly shaped leaf to enhance my image. And waited. And waited….
During my workshops I enjoy observing my students in the field, the things that draw them and way each brings his or her own personality to the act of creating an image. I could go on and on about any of these differences, but this experience really underscores a particular aspect of my approach, so (since this is my blog) I thought I’d pause my story briefly to write about that. (Read to the end for a plot twist.)
Anyone who has ever photographed with me knows how deliberate I am in the field. It starts with a large measure of calculation, often starting long before I arrive, then scrutinizing the scene upon my arrival to determine the elements that draw the eye, what to include and exclude, and identifying the various ways to do that. When I finally get all those pieces assembled in my brain, I’ll wait as long as it takes (or at least for as long as I have) for the conditions to be perfect, evaluating and refining my composition as I wait. Many (charitably) label this “patience,” though it may include a significant component of stubbornness a well: “I’m not leaving here until I get exactly what I want.” Whatever you call it, this approach works for me because careful observation and measured response is the way I engage with the world. Once I think everything is right, I’ll work the composition to with in an inch of its life: repositioning to change relationships, zooming closer and farther, switching between horizontal and vertical, adjusting my polarizer for a variety of reflection effects, and so on.
But that’s me. More spontaneous photographers are far more energetic and restless in the field, constantly moving and exploring, exposing themselves to far more opportunities than I do. And while I may get more from my scenes than they do, they often capture things I never even laid eyes on.
Whatever your approach, there’s no “best” way for photographers to approach their craft. Leading workshops means being exposed daily to the product of other photographers’ efforts at the same locations I’m photographing. For each time I’m thrilled with an image I know I wouldn’t have found had I not waited patiently and worked it carefully, I can cite someone else’s image that caused me to kick myself because I spent all my time in one spot.
Plot twist
So anyway…
Even though this is a brand new post about a “brand new” (never processed or shared) image, all this happened 18 years ago. Despite the time that has elapsed between its capture and coming out, I still have very distinct memories of this image’s capture—the germination of the idea, the time I spent waiting for a perfect leaf to float into in the perfect location, the euphoria of eventual success, and the ultimate disappointment when I realized I’d messed up and would never be able to use the image….
Waiting nearly an hour for that perfect leaf in the perfect position, it occurred to me that the floating leave I’d seen earlier might have been a rogue one-off. But I never considered moving on, continuing to wait patiently (stubbornly) while a few tattered brown leaves drifted through my frame, and once or twice while a perfectly shaped yellow leaf floated by just out of my frame. About the time advancing darkness forced me to consider that it might be about time to give up, I spotted a promising leaf surrounded by an entourage of smaller leaves just upstream and heading directly into my frame.
My f-stop, ISO, and shutter speed had been dialed in much earlier, but a quick check of my meter told me instantly that I needed more light. With too much excitement and not enough time, instead of bumping my ISO to increase exposure while maintaining a shutter speed fast enough to freeze the moving leaves, I ignored my ISO and reflexively went with a longer shutter speed. Doh!
For 18 years I considered this image a failure because motion blur made the primary focal point too soft, but the memory of “the one that got away” has caused me to visit this very spot on each autumn visit to Yosemite since, hoping for similar opportunity. Eleven years ago I actually found something similar, albeit without a drifting leaf as a focal point. Good enough to process and share, but less than my original vision.
Then, a couple of weeks ago I upgraded my Topaz suite to the latest version so I could up-res and denoise the original files for several large prints ordered by a customer. In the past I’ve only used Topaz’s Denoise tool, but I was so pleased with my up-res results that I poked around to see what else I’d missed, and came across their Super focus tool. Realizing that, rather than the kind of pre-print sharpening I’ve been doing for years, this one actually promised to fix soft images, my mind immediately went to this “failure, and I started digging through my old image files until I found the raw file. And while the result still isn’t perfect, I was blown away by the improvement that I think is enough to actually give me a useable image. Eighteen years later.
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
Autumn Intimates
Moon Chasing
Posted on November 24, 2025
Half Dome Autumn Moonrise Reflection, Merced River, Yosemite
Sony a7R V
Sony 24-105 G
1/8 second
F/14
ISO 100
Many years ago I stood with a couple of other photographers on Sentinel Bridge in Yosemite. It was a few minutes before sunset and we were waiting, cameras poised, for the moon to ascend from behind Half Dome. As we chatted, a young woman approached and asked no one in particular what we were all waiting for. When I told her about the imminent moonrise, she laughed and advised us that we were too late, that the moon had already risen because she’d just come from watching the moonrise at Tunnel View. After several unsuccessful attempts to explain to her why the moon would in fact be arriving soon, and how the moon rises at different times depending on the viewer’s location, elevation, and nearby terrain, we finally gave up and she went on her way none the wiser.
Earlier this month my Yosemite Autumn Moon photo workshop group got the opportunity to apply this moon chasing approach firsthand, photographing a (nearly) full moon rising above Half Dome at sunset on three consecutive nights, from three different locations.
The challenge to photographing three consecutive moonrises is that, while sunset at any given location from one night to the next happens at more or less the same time, the moon rises nearly an hour later each night—in other words, if you stay put, the landscape feature that the moon rose behind last night will tonight obscure the moon until long after dark.
So, while the Sun/Moon/Earth choreography is fixed and predictable to ridiculous precision, my location for viewing this show is completely my call. Moon rising too late at one location? Just find another location that’s farther back, or higher. Or both. Of course that’s often easier said than done, but Yosemite, with its elongated east/west orientation and elevated vistas, is ideally set up for moon photography. (Not to mention its variety of world class subjects.)
(As you may have noticed) my favorite moonrise subject in Yosemite is Half Dome. And why not? Half Dome’s prominent shape stands out beautifully against open sky (rather than getting lost against a darker or more distracting terrestrial background), is viewable from countless different vantage points, and is wonderfully recognizable to the general public. But, since the moonrise location changes significantly from one month to the next, its ideal Half Dome alignment doesn’t happen most months. If I’ve learned nothing else in twenty-plus years of chasing moonrises in Yosemite, I do know that the full moon and Half Dome only align during one or two months on either side of the winter solstice—the rest of the year the moon rises either too far south (most months), which puts it behind Yosemite Valley’s towering south wall, or (maybe once or twice) too far north, putting it behind El Capitan.
Before attempting to photograph a moonrise, it’s important to understand that a location’s published sunrise/set or moonrise/set times always assumes a flat horizon. So unless you’re atop a mountain or on a ship at sea, you’ll probably see the sun disappear behind the terrain in the west before sunset, and you’ll probably need to wait until after moonrise for the moon to ascend above the terrain in the east.
In general, my goal for photographing any full moonrise is to get the moon near the horizon during the window that spans 15 minutes before to 15 minutes after the “official” (flat horizon) sunset. Earlier than that, there’s not enough contrast for the moon to stand out against still too-bright sky; later, there’s too much dynamic range to capture detail in the dark landscape and daylight-bright moon. Since the location for viewing the moon in that that sweet spot changes from night to night, so does my location.
With the sun at my back when viewing a rising full moon, I’m not too concerned about the precise timing of the sun’s disappearance—I know that once direct sunlight is off the landscape, the sky will still be bright enough to illuminate the foreground for 20 or 30 minutes. But I need to be pretty dead-on with the location and timing of the moon’s arrival.
Knowing the moon will rise about 40-60 minutes later each day, it’s easy to infer that the greater the number of days until the full moon, the earlier the moon will rise and the higher it will be at sunset. (Regrettably) I have no control over the timing of the absolute (flat horizon) sunset/moonrise, but I can control the elevation of my own personal horizon, and therefore the moon’s appearance on any given evening, by simply choosing my position relative to the point on the horizon above which the moon will rise.
To make this Yosemite workshop’s consecutive moonrises work, for our first evening I targeted a favorite riverside spot beneath Half Dome, on the east side of Yosemite Valley. For our second sunset, my original plan was to be at another spot on the Merced River near he middle of the valley, but we ended up photographing that evening’s moonrise from Glacier Point because I feared a forecast storm threatened to thwart the Glacier Point shoot I’d planned for our fourth and final night. The workshop’s main moonrise event was the Tunnel View moonrise on our third sunset, which I wrote about a couple of weeks ago. Only on that third evening was the moon the scene’s primary focal point—those first two evenings it was more of an accent to already beautiful scenes, but a wonderful accent it was.
Since this year’s autumn moon workshop started on the first day of standard time, the earlier than we’d all been accustomed to shorted our afternoon by an hour. That, combined with the fact that the spot I had in mind for that initial moonrise, while largely overlooked by tourists, is no secret to photographers. Wanting to get my group set-up before more people arrived, I passed on my usual workshop first shooting location and headed straight to my moonrise location.
Arriving an hour before sunset and finding it largely unoccupied, we had about 45 minutes to work before the moon appeared. The fall color and reflections were great, but clouds completely obscured the sky behind Half Dome to the point that it looked like the moon might be a no-show. But as we enjoyed the otherwise beautiful photography, the clouds parted just in time for the moon’s arrival.
I started with tighter telephoto shots, but quickly widened my composition as the moon separated from the ridge, trying both vertical and horizontal frames. Since I already have quite a few vertical moonrise images from here, I opted process this even wider horizontal frame and am extremely pleased with the way all the ingredients came together for an image I didn’t already have.
In defense of a small moon
Any time I share a wide angle image of the moon, I know I might hear from someone who tells me they’d prefer the image without the moon at all. And many years ago, when I proposed an article on photographing the moon to “Outdoor Photographer” magazine, the editor at the time (not the current OP editor) replied that moon photographs don’t work because the moon appears so much smaller in a photograph than people remember it.
They’re certainly entitled to their opinion, but I’ve never thought the moon needs to appear large to be an effective subject. I always look for ways to add something to an already beautiful scene that might make it stand out from the many other images of that scene, and the moon, with outsize emotional power that punches well above its weight, can dominate a disproportional segment of any frame.
And you don’t need to take my word for it. Ansel Adams certainly had this figured out long before I came on the scene, making a small moon the prime focal point of many compositions, including the image that’s arguably his most famous, “Moonrise, Hernandez, New Mexico.”
Join me in Yosemite
Workshop Schedule ||Purchase Prints || Instagram
Let’s Hear it for Small Moons
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE
Let’s Get Vertical (Again)
Posted on November 16, 2025
New Day, Tunnel View, Yosemite
iPhone 17 Pro
(This seed of today’s blog is a post from many years ago—but the image and its story are brand new.)
What’s your orientation?
I’ve always questioned the reasoning behind labeling horizontally oriented images, “landscape,” and vertically oriented images, “portrait.” Despite my profession as a landscape (-only) photographer, nearly half of my images use “portrait” orientation. So it concerns me that this arbitrary naming bias might subconsciously encourage photographers to default to a horizontal orientation for their landscape images, even when a vertical orientation might be best.
The orientation of an image imparts implicit visual motion that’s independent of the eyes’ movement between an image’s visual elements. Photographers who understand that viewers’ eyes tend to move along the frame’s long side have an extra tool for guiding those eyes, and even to convey a mood.
For example, when orienting an image of a sunset on the coast, it’s easy to default without thinking to the same horizontal orientation that the distant horizon follows. And a waterfall image that’s oriented vertically certainly encourages the viewers’ eyes to move in the same direction as the water’s motion, so orienting the frame to match certainly seems reasonable. But, despite the natural instinct to match the frame’s orientation to the scene’s dominant flow, there is no absolute best way to orient an ocean, waterfall, or any other scene—there’s always a choice, and that choice matters. While matching the image’s orientation to the scene’s natural movement in this manner can instill a calmness to the image, a vertical ocean sunset, or horizontal waterfall, can create visual tension that can also be quite compelling.
Since I don’t need to convince most landscape photographers to take more horizontal pictures, I’m going to concentrate on the benefits of a vertical frame. One thing I especially like about orienting my landscape scenes vertically is the way it moves my viewer’s eyes through the scene from front to back, enhancing the illusion of depth that’s so important in a two-dimensional photo. And because of a vertical frame’s relative narrowness, a foreground element (that might get lost in a wider horizontal frame) instantly becomes the focal starting point that starts my viewer’s visual journey through the frame to whatever striking background I want to feature.
More than just guiding the eye through the frame, vertical orientation narrows the frame, enabling me to eliminate distractions or less compelling objects left and right of the scene’s prime subject(s). This makes vertical my preferred orientation when I want to emphasize an especially striking foreground from above (like Tunnel View), or a sky brimming with colorful clouds or a host of stars.
While a horizontally oriented scene is often the best way to convey the sweeping majesty of a broad landscape, I sometimes enjoy guiding my viewers’ eyes with vertical compositions of traditionally horizontal scenes. Tunnel View in Yosemite, where I think many photographers tend to compose too wide, is a great example. The scene to the left of El Capitan and the right of Cathedral Rocks just can’t compete with the El Capitan, Half Dome, Bridalveil Fall triumvirate, yet the world is full of Tunnel View images that shrink this trio to include (relatively) nondescript granite.
That’s why, when the foreground and sky aren’t particularly interesting, I often go for fairly tight horizontal compositions at Tunnel View. And while Tunnel View is among the most spectacular views on Earth, the foreground beneath the vista is usually quite bland, and overhead California’s chronic blue skies are frustratingly boring. So I’m afraid many of my Tunnel View images are horizontal, and rarely stray far left of El Capitan, or right of Cathedral Rocks.
Fortunately, there are exceptions. One of my favorite exceptions is those rare times when fresh snow smothers the evergreen valley floor. Another favorite is dramatic clouds, whether in the valley below or sky above. Faced with visual treats like this, vertical frames are wide enough to feature the foreground and/or sky without diluting the Tunnel View drama by including extraneous granite.
More specifically…
In Yosemite, one thing I never count on when there’s no weather in the forecast is a nice sunrise. That’s because Yosemite’s (default) blank skies, coupled with Tunnel View’s east-facing view, forces sunrise shooters to photograph fully shaded subjects (El Capitan, Half Dome, Cathedral Rocks, and Bridalveil Fall) against the brightest part of the sky. That’ why, without clouds, Tunnel View is much better late afternoon to sunset. For me, on a typical (empty sky) Yosemite morning, the real show is the first light on El Capitan, which arrives about 15 to 20 minutes after sunrise. On mornings with no clouds forecast, I usually start my groups with an El Capitan reflection of that first light—not only is this a reliably beautiful sight, everyone gets to sleep an hour longer (since going for the actual sunrise means being on location at least 30 minutes before sunrise instead of 20 minutes after).
But for whatever reason, and despite a promise of clear skies all morning (until a storm was forecast to start moving in that afternoon), I decided to hedge my bets on the final sunrise shoot of this month’s Yosemite Autumn Moon photo workshop. Normally we spend this final morning at Bridalveil Creek, arriving as soon as it’s light enough to start shooting in the dense shade there. Instead, I got everyone out about 30 minutes earlier and headed straight to Tunnel View. While this wouldn’t be early enough to shoot sunrise from start to finish, it would get us there in time for the best color in the remote chance the clouds arrived earlier than forecast. And that’s exactly what happened.
We were pulling in just as the cirrus precursors to the evening rain started lighting up. Since my group had already been up here twice, everyone was out of the cars and grabbing their gear before my seatbelt was off. Half the group beelined to the standard view with my brother (who was assisting me in this workshop), while the rest joined me on a granite ledge above the TV parking lot (a similar view, but with fewer people—also a little more physically challenging, and not the favorite spot of anyone bothered by heights).
As beautiful as the sky was, since I rarely photograph at Tunnel View anymore, my camera stayed in the car and I was content to just enjoy the show. Or so I believed. But as I stood there watching the color keep getting better and better, I started to second guess my decision to forego my camera. I knew I could be down to my car any back in less than 5 minutes, but the color was changing so rapidly, I also knew that would mean missing the best stuff. So I whipped out my iPhone 17 Pro, put it into RAW mode, and quickly framed up the scene.
With the great sky and bland foreground, I didn’t consider anything but vertical compositions. At first I went wide enough to include Bridalveil Fall, and though it was flowing nicely for autumn, it really wasn’t impressive enough to justify going that wide. So I quickly tightened my framing to include only El Capitan and Half Dome, putting in only the minimum amount of foreground so I could maximize the spectacular sky. I’d love to tell you what focal length, f-stop, and shutter speed I used, but my iPhone made all those decisions for me, and clearly did a pretty great job. What a time to be alive!
A few thoughts on iPhone image quality
Okay, seriously, as great as the iPhone (or any other current smartphone) camera is, let me remind you that smartphone image quality is nowhere near the quality of today’s full frame sensors and lenses. And I actually got a firsthand reminder of this fact while processing this image. Though I was truly blown away by the detail my iPhone captured, on the day I processed today’s image, I also prepared three large prints that had been ordered by an interior designer for the home of one of her customers. Though two of these images were captured more than 15 years ago with my Canon 1DS III (21 megapixels); the other was about 10 years old, from my Sony a7R II (42 megapixels), I was pretty confident the quality and detail this job required was all there.
-
- Stillness, South Tufa, Mono Lake
-
- First Light, Yosemite Valley
-
- Yosemite Sky, Tunnel View, Yosemite (2016)
And because maximizing this quality was the highest priority for her customer, she opted for custom prints rather than just going through my standard (much cheaper) SmugMug prints website (www.garyhartprints.com), where the images are pre-uploaded, medium resolution jpegs waiting for anyone to order (full disclosure: I’ve never had a single complaint about one of these prints). To prepare the images for printing, I returned to the original files and did extensive prep (using the latest processing technology) to ensure that the noise reduction, up-res, and sharpening got the most out of every single pixel.
I am absolutely certain I could print an iPhone image as large as these custom orders were (24×36) without apologizing. But getting up-close and personal with these three full-frame sensor prints at the same time I was processing an iPhone image, the detail captured left little doubt that, for anything much larger or more demanding than computer/web display, smartphone capture has a long way to go to catch “real” cameras. (But I’m still pretty thrilled to know that I can get useable quality any time Nature catches me without my real camera.)
Join me in Yosemite
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
Let’s Get Vertical
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE
Super? Moon
Posted on November 8, 2025
November Moon, Half Dome from Tunnel View, Yosemite
Sony a7R V
Sony 200-600 G
Sony 1.4x teleconverter
ISO 200
f/9
1/80 second
This week’s full moon was a “supermoon”—or, as the media frequently proclaimed, “The biggest moon of 2025!” And while that is technically true, the size difference between a super and average moon is barely perceptible.
So, as a public service, I’ve dusted off and updated a prior article explaining the supermoon phenomenon (any hyperbole)—and what better time to share it than just days after photographing the November supermoon?
What’s the big deal?
So what exactly is so “super” about a “supermoon?” Answer: Not much. Or, maybe a better way to answer the question would be: When presented with a random series of full moon images, would you in fact be able to identify the supermoon? Doubtful. So why the media frenzy? And why do we see so many huge moon images every time there’s a supermoon? So many questions….
Celestial choreography: Supermoon explained
To understand what a supermoon is, you first have to understand that all orbiting celestial bodies travel in an ellipse, not a circle. That’s because, for two (or more) objects to have the gravitational relationship an orbit requires, each must have mass. And if they have mass, each has a gravitational influence on the other. Without getting too deep into the gravitational weeds, let’s just say that the mutual influence the earth and moon have on each other causes the moon’s orbit to deviate ever so slightly from the circle it seems to be (without precise measurement): an ellipse. And because its orbit isn’t round, as the moon circles Earth, its distance varies with the position in its orbit.
An orbiting object’s closest approach to the center of its ellipse (and the object it orbits) is at perigee; its greatest distance from the ellipse’s center is apogee. And the time it takes an object to complete one revolution of its orbit is its period. For example, earth’s orbital period around the sun is one year (365.25-ish days), while the period of our moon’s orbit is slightly more than 27 days.
But if the moon reaches perigee every 27 days, why don’t we have a supermoon every month? That’s because we’ve also added “syzygy” to the supermoon definition. In addition to being a great Scrabble word, syzygy (though it would cost you 2 blank tiles) is the alignment of celestial bodies—in this case it’s the alignment of the sun, moon, and earth (not necessarily in that order). Not only does a supermoon need to be at perigee, it must also be syzygy.
Syzygy happens twice each month, once when the moon is new (moon between the sun and Earth), and again when it’s full (Earth between the sun and moon). While technically a supermoon can also be a new moon, the full moon that gets all the press because a new moon is lost in the sun’s brightness and never visible, so no one cares. Since Earth circles the sun while the moon revolves around Earth, to achieve syzygy, with each orbit the moon has to travel a couple extra days to catch up. That’s why the moon reaches perigee evey 27 days, but syzygy comes every 29.5 days—the moon’s distance from earth is different with each syzygy because it comes at different points in the orbit.
The view from earth: Supermoon observed
While lunar perigee, apogee, and period are precise terms that can be measured to the microsecond, a supermoon is a non-scientific, media-fueled phenomenon loosely defined as a moon that happens to be at or near perigee when it’s full. To you, the viewer, a full moon at perigee (the largest possible supermoon) will appear about 14% larger and 30% brighter than a full moon at the average distance. The rather arbitrary consensus definition of the distance that qualifies a moon as a supermoon is a full moon that is within 90 percent of its closest approach to earth.
I really doubt that the average viewer could look up at even the largest possible supermoon and be certain that it’s larger than an average moon. And all those mega-moon photos that confuse people into expecting a spectacular sight when there’s a supermoon? They’re either composites—a picture of a large moon inserted into a different scene—or long telephoto images. (I don’t do composites, but they’re a creative choice that I’m fine with others doing as long as they’re clearly identified as composites.)
For an image that’s not a composite, the moon’s size in the frame is almost entirely a function of the focal length used. I have no idea whether most of the moons in the full moon gallery below were super, average, or small.
Can you identify the supermoon?
Well, if you said the big moon is a supermoon, you’d be right. But it’s kind of a trick question, because these are both images of Tuesday’s supermoon. The size difference is entirely a function of the focal length I used: around 100 mm for the small moon, more than 800 mm for the large one. What these images also make clear is that what I gain in moon size, I lose in field of view—you can’t have both. So when you see a wide angle scene with a huge moon, don’t think supermoon, think composite: a big moon dropped into a wide scene. Or worse still: AI. (Yuck.)
Every full moon is super
As far as I’m concerned, a rising or setting full moon is one of the most beautiful things in nature. But because a full moon rises around sunset and sets around sunrise, when most people are eating dinner or sleeping, seeing it is often an accident—maybe the moon catches your eye as you walk out of the store, or you spot it in near the horizon when your car rounds a bend. But viewing a moonrise or moonset doesn’t need to be an accident. There’s loads of information available online that will tell you which night to look for a full moon, and the general time and direction to look. And for people like me, who try to photograph moonrises and moonsets around an alignment with a terrestrial feature, there is also slightly more technical info that enables more precise planning.
About this image
Which brings me to this week’s image (images), captured Tuesday evening from my very favorite location to view a moonrise: Tunnel View in Yosemite. Why is Tunnel View my favorite moonrise location? Because I can’t think of a better combination beautiful subjects and distant view (nearly 9 miles to Half Dome), that allows me to photography the moon large with with a long telephoto lens and include a striking foreground subject. And if I just want to use the moon to accent a broader scene, the wide angle view at Tunnel View is not too shabby either.
As with most of my moonrise images, this one had been on my radar for over a year. And like many of my moonrise opportunities, I scheduled a workshop so I could share it with other enthusiastic nature photographers. But, since I don’t care about supermoons, I had no idea this November full moon would be a supermoon—and as I grew tired of hearing in the preceding weeks, the largest full moon of 2025! (Yawn.)
The way this month’s full moon set up, I was able to get my group a couple of practice moonrises from other Yosemite locations leading up the Tuesday moonrise—one with a reflection of Half Dome, and another from Glacier Point. Not only did they lear exposure and processing techniques that allow the capture of lunar and landscape detail with a single click, they got beautiful (albeit wider, with a small moon) moon images. I also demonstrated in a training session how I plot the moonrise (without using celestial plotting apps like Photographer’s Ephemeris and Photo Pills).
There’s often drama surrounding an impending moonrise as I stress about forecasts that promise clouds, or a sky filled with more clouds than forecast. This year, despite the threat of rain the following day, the Tuesday evening forecast was clear skies. And true to expectations, the entire afternoon was cloud free.
I got my group up to Tunnel View about a half hour before the moon’s expected arrival, so we all had plenty of time to get set up and settled in. About half of the group joined me on a granite slab above the Tunnel View parking lot, with the rest of the group setting up with my brother Jay and the hoards of other photographers at the wall in front of the parking lot (the standard Tunnel View vista).
I had two tripods set up: one with my (big and sturdy) RRS TVC-24L, with my Sony a7R V and 1.4X teleconverter; one with my Sony a1 and 100-400. My plan was to switch between the two bodies, and to switch out the 200-600 for my 24-105 once the moon separated from the landscape. In other words, I’d be using the a1 with the 100-400 for the entire shoot, and the a7R V with the 200-600 (first) and 24-105 (after a few minutes).
As we waited, I reminded my group that the moon would appear just a little left of Half Dome at around 4:45 (about 15 minutes before sunset), plus/minus 5 minutes. I also told my group that, depending on their camera and metering skills, we’d be able to continue photographing up to 15 minutes after sunset before the foreground became too dark to capture both lunar and landscape detail with one click. The moon arrived right on schedule, right around 4:44 and we were in business….
So maybe the best thing to come of the recent supermoon hype is that it’s gotten people, cameras or not, to appreciate the beauty of a full moon. If you like what you see, mark your calendar for every full moon and make it a regular part of your life—you won’t be sorry.
Join me in a Yosemite workshop
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
Tunnel View Moonrise Collection (Super and Otherwise)
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE
Open Mind and Open Eyes
Posted on November 1, 2025
Splash of Rainbow, South Tufa, Mono Lake
Sony α1
Sony 16-35 GM II
6 seconds
F/11
ISO 100
As landscape photographers, it’s easy to arrive at a photo location with a preconceived idea of what we’re going to shoot. That’s often because there’s a single perspective that gets all the attention, dominating the images of the location shared online and skewing the perception of what its images should look like.
Stillness, South Tufa, Mono Lake
At Mono Lake, despite its sprawling layout with lake views that span 270 degrees, photographers (myself included) tend to gravitate the east-facing beach with a solitary tufa tower that resembles a battleship floating just a couple hundred feet offshore. I can’t deny that it’s a striking feature worthy of photographing, but certainly not to the exclusion of other opportunities at South Tufa.
Fortunately, since this spot is at the most distant corner of South Tufa, getting out there requires walking past most of the other views on the route. So each time I take a workshop group for its first visit to South Tufa, as I guide them out to this distant beach, I make a point of emphasizing all the possibilities along the way, encouraging them to stick with me all the way out to the battleship view, but to file away other scenes they might want to return to as they go.
But photography at South Tufa isn’t just about the views—equally important is the light. So another point I try to emphasize on that initial walk is understanding—given that there are photo-worthy views that include both lake and tufa facing east, north, and west—how much the scene will change with the direction of the sunlight. Since our first visit is usually a sunset shoot, I remind everyone how different the light will be when we return for sunrise the next morning. I point out where the sun will rise and encourage them to visualize the different light we’ll see that will opportunities in multiple directions, and to identify potential compositions that might work in that light.
Since we’d been there the prior evening, as soon as this year’s group arrived dark and early on this autumn morning, everyone scattered quickly. I brought up the rear, checking in with everyone on my walk out to the battleship tufa beach. As much as I like the scene at this east-facing beach, one challenge is that it’s in the midst of what might be best describes as a tufa garden—a collection of stubby shrubs and 10-15 foot high tufa towers—that makes it very difficult to see what’s happening in the other directions. But with a nice mix of clouds and sky this morning, I knew the potential existed for a nice sunrise and made a point of keeping my head on a swivel to avoid missing something in the other directions.
About 15 minutes before sunrise I noticed the clouds in the west start catching light, and shortly thereafter the Sierra peaks in the same direction lit up. I let the near me know that this might be a good time to wander over to the other side of the tufa garden and headed in that direction. The walk to the other side is probably less than 100 feet, but by the time I got there the light on the base of the clouds had intensified significantly. And much to my amazement—given that there was no sign of rain here, nor any rain at all forecast for the area that morning—realized that a splash of rainbow was perched atop the hills across the lake.
Not knowing how long the rainbow would last, I ran around hailing as many in my group as possible, and we all went straight to work trying to make a photo before it went away. I’m a strong proponent of finding compositions where all the elements work together, which is no small feat at South Tufa, given all the randomly situated tufa towers and rocks jutting from the water. Fortunately, as I moved around trying to organize all the visual elements in my scene, not only did the rainbow seem to be waiting for me to finish, it actually intensified as I did it.
It probably didn’t take more than a minute or two, but it felt like forever before I found a composition that satisfied me. As you can see, this rainbow was never destined to be the main subject—at its best it was simply a colorful accent to an already beautiful scene. But what an accent it was.
In addition to the distant rainbow and sunlit clouds, the other important elements I needed to organize were primarily in my foreground: the tufa peninsula jutting in from the left; the small tufa island at my feet, the submerged tufa stones; and (especially) the reflection.
To make all this work together, I started by centering the little island in my frame, and balancing the rainbow with the tallest spire of the peninsula. With the scene left/right balanced, I decided I need to get my boots muddy and set my tripod in shallow water to turn the foreground tufa into an actual island. Since the best clouds were fairly low, I only included enough sky to include them (by putting the top of my frame where I did, viewers can infer that the clouds stretch much farther than they did), and was careful not to put the little blip of tufa on the far right too close to the edge.
Now for the reflection. I didn’t really care for the empty water between the reflection and the little island, so I slowly dropped my tripod, keeping an eye on my LCD and stopping when the reflection filled almost all of that watery void. I put on my Breakthrough 6-stop dark polarizer to smooth the water, and it to reveal the interesting detail on the lakebed without erasing the colorful part of the reflection. Finally, I focused on the small rocks just beyond my foreground island, and clicked.
This is not a scene I’d have normally gravitated to, but I was drawn by the light (and stayed for the rainbow). Had I not seen the rainbow, I’m not even sure I’d have taken the time to build the composition I ended up with, but this is just one more reminder that if you open your mind and your eyes, things just have a way of working out.
Workshop Schedule || Purchase Prints || Instagram
Mono Views
Click any image to scroll through the gallery LARGE
Eloquent Images by Gary Hart 