Cameras are stupid

In a previous life I spent several years doing technical support. For me job-one was convincing people that, despite all error messages to the contrary, they are in fact smarter than their computers. Most errors occur because the computer just didn’t understand: If I misspell a wurd, you still know what I mean (rite?); not so with a computer. A computer can’t anticipate, reason, or create; it will blithely continue repeating a mistake, no matter how egregious, until it is instructed otherwise or it destroys itself. All this applies equally to cameras–no matter how advanced its technology, a camera just can’t compete with your brain. Really.

If I’d have allowed my camera to decide the exposure for this crescent moon rising above Yosemite Valley, I’d have ended up with a useless mess: The camera would have decided that the foreground trees and rocks were important and allowed enough light to reveal them, completely washing out the color in the sky in the process. But I thought the contents of the foreground shadows were a distraction and wanted to simplify the scene to include only the moon’s delicate shape and the silhouette of Half Dome and Sentinel Dome etched against the rich blue of the pre-dawn sky.

It’s scenes like this that cause me to never trust my camera’s decision making. In my thirty-five or so years of serious photography, I’ve never used anything but manual exposure. And since I try to have elements at different depths throughout my frame, focus is usually my decision and not my camera’s.

Today’s cameras are more technologically advanced than ever; the auto modes are quite good, good enough that nobody should feel they must switch to manual if they fear it will rob the pleasure they get from photography. But if you define photographic pleasure as getting the best possible results, try spending a little time mastering manual metering and exposure. In my workshops, where I teach (but never require) manual metering to anyone who’s interested, people frequently marvel at how easy it is to take control of their camera. Give yourself some credit and give it a try. And don’t let your camera intimidate you.

5 Comments on “Cameras are stupid

  1. True that! I most often shoot in Aperture or Shutter priority but when they fail me or when I want total control (like you in the pic above) I always go to manual.
    Awesome picture by the way! 😉

  2. Pingback: Cameras are stupid, Part deux | Eloquent Nature by Gary Hart

  3. I do always use manual exposure- but usually rely on the camera’s TTL metering….So do you recommend a hand held meter for nature photography? I use one for portrait work, but don’t normally use it outside- just rely on the histogram and adjust as necessary….Any thoughts on that?
    Someday I would LOVE to take one of your workshops….I know I would learn SO much!

    • I’ve always used my camera’s through-the-lens meter. While a hand-held meter might be slightly more accurate, consistency is more important than accuracy. You quickly and intuitively adjust to the minor but consistent inaccuracies of a camera’s TTL meter to the point where metering becomes second nature. I always thought a hand-held meter was more trouble than it was worth in the field–just one more thing to interrupt the creative flow.

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: