Sunset Silhouettes, Desert View, Grand Canyon
Sony a7R II
Tamron 150-600 (Canon-mount with Metabones IV adapter)
1/125 second
F/11
ISO 200
It’s no secret that a prime benefit of mirrorless photography is the smaller form-factor of the bodies and lenses. And while I was looking forward to lightening my bag when I made the switch, it turns out that my first mirrorless thought wasn’t, “Oh gee, this bag is so light!” (it was). My first thought was actually, “Oh gee, look at all that extra room!”
While everyone knows that nature abhors a vacuum, it appears that nature photographers do too. Rather than leave that space empty and revel in my eased burden, I opted to fill every cubic inch with more gear. So, in a bag that was formerly maxed out with one Canon SLR body and four lenses covering 16mm to 200mm, I now carry three mirrorless bodies and four lenses that go from 16mm to 600mm. It’s the heaviest bag I’ve ever carried—and I love every ounce of it.
Occupying the most bag real estate (and weight!) is a Tamron 150-600mm lens (and Metabones adapter). My original thought when I purchased the Tamron was that I’d leave this beast in the car and only lug it out for very specific uses (much the way I used my Canon 100-400). But I’ve been having so much fun doing long telephotos with the 150-600 that I suck it up and pack it out pretty much everywhere I go.
I had particular fun with the big Tamron on my recent Grand Canyon trip. With distant vistas at virtually every stop, Grand Canyon provides infinite opportunities for the isolation and compression shots an extreme telephoto lens does so well. Suddenly I was enjoying familiar vistas in brand new ways—far off rock spires and buttes suddenly filled my entire frame, the distance separating receding ridges compressed until they lined up like a column of dominos, and the sun’s throbbing disk expanded on the horizon like a hot air balloon.
On the final sunset of our second workshop, Don Smith and I guided the group to Desert View, where we all spread along the rim west of the Watchtower. The canyon was extremely hazy, but I told everyone in the group within earshot that the haze would subdue the sun enough that we’d probably get that red rubber ball sun as it dropped from view.
I wasn’t planning to shoot, but as I stood on the rim working with the students (who were by now pretty independent anyway), I couldn’t resist setting up my tripod and breaking out the 150-600. Anticipating where the sun would reach the horizon, I moved a little east to balance it better with the most striking features in the view. Then I framed up my composition and waited for the sun to slip into the haze. With the help of my 3-stop Singh-Ray reverse graduated neutral density filter, I was indeed able to retain some yellow in the sun while still capturing silhouettes of the ridges stacked all the way to the horizon.
When I got the image home and opened it in Lightroom, the canyon was completely black, and the sun was a white disk. But tugging the Shadows slider to the right pulled out the silhouettes you see here (with remarkably little noise), and dragging the Highlights slider all the way to the left filled almost the entire sun with yellow (a thin band of white remained along the top edge, which I touched up in Photoshop). While the sun appeared more red to my eye, I was thrilled to get any color at all.
Click an image for a closer look, and a slide show. Refresh the screen to reorder the display.
This summer I rented some long lenes to field test. I tried the Sony 200-400 G and the Tamron 150-600. I sent the Sony back and kept the Tamron. It is so clear and sharp at 600 (900 on my cropped sensor) I was blown away. I was looking for a lens for whale watching and wildlife, but I will also be keeping this one handy. I got to admit that both you and Don have inspired me with the landscapes you shoot with it.
This string is a great read. Can you tell me what backpack you are using to haul your gear?
Thanks, Ray. I use an F-Stop Tilopa with a medium (I think) ICU.
Just bought a used Tilopa with Medium Pro ICU. I like it better than the new Mountain series.
Great shots – my biggest problem with the extra long lenses other than the price is of course the weight (being a 5’6″ woman) not just carrying it but handling it, i have heard great things about the new Tamron long lenses but also heard they are heavy.
If you can find one used the 200-500 is quite a bit lighter.
Thanks, Jeff.
Yeah, they’re quite heavy. I usually keep mine in the car and only bring it out when I know I’ll need it. It just seems like lately I’ve been finding more reasons to need it. 🙂
I also have big boy Tamron, for the money there’s nothing that can best it!
Agree!
Great post and images, Gary. Had to smile when you filled up the empty spaces in your bag!
Thanks, Jane. Yeah, camera bag space is like closet and garage space. 🙂
That Tamron really looks to be a kicker of a lens…I am saving my coins as best I can -This is a tremendous image, Gary Absolutely spectacular with the composition that you chose being just beautiful with the sun and silhouettes smiling at each other – just like you hinted at 🙂
Thanks, Denny. Yeah, it’s a great lens—heavy, but I like it so much better than my Canon 100-400 (series 1).
Thank you Gary – in addition to nature and landscape I am also thinking of the high school daytime baseball and night football (under the lights uh oh) games
Sorry hit send too soon but you probably get the drift Thank you Gary 😎
Oh man, Gary. Every photo in this gallery SLAYS me.
Thanks, Frank.